Federal contractor · RICHLAND, WA

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SERVICES, LLC

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SERVICES, LLC received $2.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 18 awards (−82% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $67M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($2.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$2.9M
New awards
18
Sole-source
86%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
TYBCJ5ENGT67
Small businessMinority-ownedNative-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.1MFY2017
  2. 779.5KFY2018
  3. 1.8MFY2019
  4. 6.4MFY2020
  5. 5.8MFY2021
  6. 13MFY2022
  7. 9.4MFY2023
  8. 9.7MFY2024
  9. 16.1MFY2025
  10. 2.9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 16 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$1.6M53%
  2. Facilities & utilities$798.6K27%
  3. Research & development$575K20%

Where the work was performed

  1. Pima County, AZ$44.9K1.5%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition86%
    US 39% · $2.5M
  • Sole-source awards86%
    US 30% · $2.5M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· San Bernardino County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Apr 4, 2025 – May 12, 2026· W9126G25C0004
  2. Department of the Army· Walla Walla County, WA· Facilities & utilities· May 12, 2021 – Apr 22, 2026· W912EF21C0016
  3. Department of the Army· Benton County, WA· Professional services· Feb 12, 2025 – Mar 23, 2026· W912EF25C0004
  4. Department of the Army· Yuma County, AZ· Facilities & utilities· Sep 27, 2022 – Nov 4, 2025· W912BV22F0162
  5. Department of the Army· Galveston County, TX· Professional services· Aug 19, 2025 – May 22, 2026· W912BV25FA037
  6. Department of the Army· Benton County, WA· Facilities & utilities· May 6, 2025 – Jun 1, 2026· W912PL25F0074
  7. Department of the Army· Jackson County, OK· Facilities & utilities· Sep 24, 2022 – Feb 25, 2026· W912BV22F0129
  8. Department of the Army· Warren County, MS· Research & development· May 29, 2026 – May 29, 2026· W912HZ26FA109

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MDB GROUP LLC$24.6M−79% in FY2026
    LORTON, VA · 82% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. HR SERVICES SOLUTIONS, LLC$22.4M−14% in FY2026
    HAYMARKET, VA · 78% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. SOL SOLUTIONS, LLC$21.9M−81% in FY2026
    TEMPE, AZ · 72% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesArmy · Remediation and other waste management services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.