Federal contractor · CHIYODA-KU

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE CORPORATION

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE CORPORATION received $1.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 16 awards (−81% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $34.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($975.3K).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.5M
New awards
16
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
2.6%
UEI
DA1UKWF24CH7
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.9MFY2017
  2. 2.9MFY2018
  3. 1.9MFY2019
  4. 2.5MFY2020
  5. 4MFY2021
  6. 3.7MFY2022
  7. 3.5MFY2023
  8. 4.5MFY2024
  9. 7.8MFY2025
  10. 1.5MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 6 awards
  2. 8 awards
  3. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$975.3K66%
  2. Facilities & utilities$504K34%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$1.5M100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition2.6%
    US 39% · $38.2K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions2.6%
    US 8.7% · $38.2K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Facilities & utilities· Sep 11, 2025 – Jun 2, 2026· N4008425P0009
  2. Department of the Navy· Facilities & utilities· Jan 29, 2024 – Dec 4, 2025· N4008424F4195
  3. Department of the Army· Professional services· Mar 28, 2025 – Mar 12, 2026· W912HV25P0007
  4. Department of the Navy· Facilities & utilities· Jan 30, 2024 – Mar 23, 2026· N4008424F4203
  5. Department of the Army· Professional services· May 29, 2026 – May 29, 2026· W912HV26PA003
  6. Department of the Army· Professional services· Aug 13, 2025 – Mar 27, 2026· W912HV25P0014
  7. Department of the Navy· Facilities & utilities· Jun 2, 2023 – Jan 30, 2026· N4008423F4486
  8. Department of the Navy· Facilities & utilities· Jul 6, 2023 – Feb 18, 2026· N4008423F4571

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $3M (7 subawards)

5 primes

  1. ARLINGTON, VA · 2 subawards
  2. ATLANTA, GA · 1 subaward
  3. LOS ANGELES, CA · 2 subawards
  4. SAN ANTONIO, TX · 1 subaward
  5. MOON TOWNSHIP, PA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $3.2M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $1.7M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $3M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $1.5M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $1.5M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $3M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

8 companies · $14M reported

  1. LOS ANGELES, CA · 16 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. ENGLEWOOD, CO · 15 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. FAIRFAX, VA · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. AMSTABILITY, LLC$6.1M+310% in FY2026
    ALEXANDRIA, VA · 43% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesNavy · Facilities support services
  2. LBM INC.$5.6M−93% in FY2026
    DUNN, NC · 41% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Facilities support services
  3. NIIHAU RANCH LLC$6.3M−23% in FY2026
    MAKAWELI, HI · 41% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Facilities support services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.