Federal contractor · NORTH CHARLESTON, SC

ENVIROSMART, LLC

ENVIROSMART, LLC received $2.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 16 awards (−40% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $51M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($1.9M).

Obligations · FY2026
$2.7M
New awards
16
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
FWDAM35VKJY8
Parent company
ENVIROSMART INC.
Small businessWoman-ownedMinority-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 7.7MFY2017
  2. 8.9MFY2018
  3. 4.9MFY2019
  4. 3.9MFY2020
  5. 3.4MFY2021
  6. 7.4MFY2022
  7. 3.7MFY2023
  8. 3.9MFY2024
  9. 4.5MFY2025
  10. 2.7MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 3 awards
  2. 12 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$1.7M63%
  2. Construction & real property$1M37%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Onslow County, NC· Construction & real property· May 23, 2026 – May 23, 2026· N4008526F0731
  2. Department of the Navy· Onslow County, NC· Facilities & utilities· Mar 4, 2026 – Mar 4, 2026· N4008526F0472
  3. Department of the Army· Smith County, TN· Facilities & utilities· Apr 29, 2025 – Feb 24, 2026· W912P525FA040
  4. Department of the Army· Pulaski County, KY· Facilities & utilities· Apr 20, 2026 – Apr 20, 2026· W912P526FA057
  5. Department of the Air Force· Berkeley County, SC· Facilities & utilities· Dec 16, 2025 – Feb 18, 2026· FA441826P0005
  6. Department of the Army· Smith County, TN· Facilities & utilities· Jan 28, 2025 – Oct 28, 2025· W912P525F0022
  7. Department of the Army· Christian County, KY· Facilities & utilities· Apr 28, 2026 – Apr 28, 2026· W9124826FA089
  8. Department of the Army· Smith County, TN· Facilities & utilities· Aug 27, 2025 – Dec 22, 2025· W912P525FA083

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $37.6K reported

  1. DENVER, CO · 1 subaward · Remediation and other waste management services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. LBM INC.$5.6M−93% in FY2026
    DUNN, NC · 49% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Facilities support services
  2. NIIHAU RANCH LLC$6.3M−23% in FY2026
    MAKAWELI, HI · 49% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Facilities support services
  3. NEXUS CONSULTING GROUP LLC$7.5M+13% in FY2026
    HONOLULU, HI · 49% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Facilities support services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.