Federal contractor · AIEA, HI
EPC SERVICE INC
EPC SERVICE INC received $27.2K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (−99% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $65.3M. Its largest customer was Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service ($55.3K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $27.2K
- New awards
- 7
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- UH4JY3JCCY97
- Parent company
- EPC SERVICE INC
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 14MFY2017
- 6.4MFY2018
- 5.6MFY2019
- 5.8MFY2020
- 6.7MFY2021
- 6.2MFY2022
- 7.5MFY2023
- 10.7MFY2024
- 2.3MFY2025
- 27.2KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- 1 awards
- Missile Defense Agency$5001.8%1 awards
- 3 awards
- Department of the Army-$28.6K0.0%2 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Construction & real property$55.3K99%
- Research & development$5000.9%
Where the work was performed
- Hawaii County, HI$55.3K100%
- Madison County, AL$5001.8%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition0.0%US 39% · $0
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.7% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration· Hawaii County, HI· Construction & real property· Aug 26, 2022 – Dec 22, 2025· 1305M322CNRMJ0052
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration· Hawaii County, HI· Construction & real property· May 27, 2024 – Apr 23, 2026· 1305M324C0018
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration· Hawaii County, HI· Construction & real property· Aug 26, 2022 – Dec 22, 2025· 1305M322CNRMJ0057
- Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service· Hawaii County, HI· Construction & real property· Aug 13, 2025 – Jun 24, 2026· 12639525C0063
- Department of the Army· Honolulu County, HI· Construction & real property· Sep 29, 2025 – Dec 10, 2025· W912CN25FA319
- Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 19, 2025 – Dec 19, 2025· HQ085926FF449
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
- Sub-contracts: $279.9K (1 subaward)
1 prime
- HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP$279.9K100%MC LEAN, VA · 1 subaward
By fiscal year
- FY2025: $0 paid out · $885.3K received
- FY2026: $0 paid out · $279.9K received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
2 companies · $1.2M reported
- PASCAGOULA, MS · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 1 subaward · Facilities support services
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 9 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- RIOMAR GROUP VENTURES, INC.$17M−78% in FY2026BROOKLYN, NY · 57% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration · Nonresidential building construction
- SEI GROUP INC$3.4M−106% in FY2026HUNTSVILLE, AL · 29% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related servicesArmy · Nonresidential building constructionNavy · Nonresidential building construction
- IGS STRATEGIC JV LLC$3.5MINDIANAPOLIS, IN · 26% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.