Federal contractor · ASHBURN, VA

EPIC SYSTEMS INC.

EPIC SYSTEMS INC. received $1.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (+19% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $9.8M. Its largest customer was Smithsonian Institution ($898.7K).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.5M
New awards
2
Sole-source
41%
Single offer
59%
UEI
N96SVL5EK8R7
Parent company
EPIC SYSTEMS INC
Small businessWoman-ownedMinority-owned8(a) program

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 25.3KFY2017
  2. 3.3MFY2018
  3. 641.5KFY2020
  4. 864.7KFY2021
  5. 687.4KFY2022
  6. 721.5KFY2023
  7. 722.6KFY2024
  8. 1.3MFY2025
  9. 1.5MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$898.7K59%
  2. Professional services$633.2K41%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100.0%
    US 39% · $1.5M
  • Sole-source awards41%
    US 30% · $633.2K
  • Single-offer competitions59%
    US 8.8% · $898.7K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. National Science Foundation· Loudoun County, VA· Professional services· Aug 20, 2024 – Jun 29, 2026· 49100424C0049
  2. Smithsonian Institution· Fairfax County, VA· IT & telecom· Sep 29, 2025 – Aug 27, 2026· 33314525F00530217

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $1.1M (2 subawards)

1 prime

  1. RESTON, VA · 2 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $8.2M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $3.1M received
  • FY2024: $376.8K paid out · $10.6M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $1.1M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

1 company · $376.8K reported

  1. SAINT PETERSBURG, FL · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $22.9M reported

  1. GROTON, CT · 6 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. RESTON, VA · 2 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. PRIWILS INC$2.8M+139% in FY2026
    BOWIE, MD · 55% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Science Foundation · Computer systems design and related services
  2. UNITED DEVELOPMENT USA INC$1.9M−88% in FY2026
    SILVER SPRING, MD · 45% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveSmithsonian Institution · Computer systems design and related services
  3. LEESBURG, VA · 55% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Science Foundation · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • EPIC SYSTEMS CORPORATIONAI match · 92%
Lobbying · 2025
$320K
8 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$1.1M
PAC giving · 2026
$17.5K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$320K
    8 reports
  2. 2024$320K
    8 reports
  3. 2025$320K
    8 reports
  4. 2026$170K
    5 reports

Top issues

  1. Health issues29 reports
  2. Computer industry14 reports
  3. Medicare and Medicaid14 reports
  4. Science and technology14 reports
  5. Budget and appropriations7 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES14 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE14 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Mehlman Consulting, Inc.$840K
    14 reports
  2. McDermott+ LLC$290K
    15 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Democratic$9,00051%
  2. Republican$8,50049%

PACs sponsored

  • EPIC SYSTEMS CORPORATION PAC (EPIC PAC)$39.4K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.