Federal contractor · KANSAS CITY, MO

EVERGY METRO, INC.

EVERGY METRO, INC. received $1.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−6.3% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $17.4M. Its largest customer was National Archives and Records Administration ($1.1M).

Obligations · FY2026: $1.1M
New awards: 2
Sole-source: 100%
Single offer: 0.0%

UEI: PZTRULB3AH88

Other than small business

Open in the contracts explorer Relationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

4.7MFY2017
2.9MFY2018
1.5MFY2019
1.5MFY2020
1.3MFY2021
1.2MFY2022
1MFY2023
1MFY2024
1.2MFY2025
1.1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

National Archives and Records Administration$1.1M100%
2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Facilities & utilities$1.1M100%

Where the work was performed

Johnson County, KS$631K58%
Jackson County, MO$450K42%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Low competition100%
US 39% · $1.1M
Sole-source awards100%
US 30% · $1.1M
Single-offer competitions0.0%
US 8.7% · $0
Urgency justifications0.0%
US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

NEW ELECTRICITY TASK ORDER AT LENEXA. FOR OTHER FUNCTIONS$6.2M
National Archives and Records Administration· Johnson County, KS· Facilities & utilities· Oct 1, 2016 – Aug 19, 2026· NAMA17F0004
NEW ELECTRICITY TASK ORDER AT LEE'S SUMMIT. FOR OTHER FUNCTIONS$4.3M
National Archives and Records Administration· Jackson County, MO· Facilities & utilities· Oct 26, 2016 – Apr 21, 2026· NAMA17F0005

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY$6.8M+4.1% in FY2026
ROSEMEAD, CA · 2 entities · 63% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Archives and Records Administration · Electric power generation, transmission and distribution
INDEPENDENCE, CITY OF$1.2M+1.9% in FY2026
INDEPENDENCE, MO · 28% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Archives and Records Administration · Electric power generation, transmission and distribution
CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY$381.1K−6.2% in FY2026
JACKSON, MI · 12% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Archives and Records Administration · Electric power generation, transmission and distribution

Showing the top 3 of 15 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

EVERGYAI match · 98%

PAC giving · 2026: $29.5K; 1 PAC

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

Republican$22K75%
Democratic$7,50025%

PACs sponsored

EVERGY EMPLOYEE POWERPAC$152.3K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Congress: members and bills

Through the organizations matched to this company: members of Congress whose campaigns received contributions from their PACs, and the bills their lobbying reports named. Shown beside the company's contracts as a comparison, not a cause.

Members whose campaigns received from its PACs, 2026 cycle

Emanuel Cleaver$5,000
D-MO-5 · House · 1 PAC
Eric Schmitt$5,000
R-MO · Senate · 1 PAC
Mark Alford$2,500
R-MO-4 · House · 1 PAC
Sharice Davids$2,500
D-KS-3 · House · 1 PAC
Sam Graves$2,500
R-MO-6 · House · 1 PAC
Roger Marshall$2,500
R-KS · Senate · 1 PAC
Ron Estes$1,500
R-KS-4 · House · 1 PAC
Tracey Mann$1,500
R-KS-1 · House · 1 PAC
Derek Schmidt$1,500
R-KS-2 · House · 1 PAC
Ann Wagner$1,500
R-MO-2 · House · 1 PAC

$27K of the $29.5K its PACs gave to federal candidates went to 11 members of Congress.

Members whose campaigns received from its PACs, 2024 cycle

Emanuel Cleaver$5,000
D-MO-5 · House · 1 PAC
Sam Graves$5,000
R-MO-6 · House · 1 PAC
Roger Marshall$5,000
R-KS · Senate · 1 PAC
Sharice Davids$4,000
D-KS-3 · House · 1 PAC
Derek Schmidt$4,000
R-KS-2 · House · 1 PAC

Direct and in-kind contributions the members' campaigns received (FEC), net of refunds. Party and seat are the member's current or latest.

Amounts, members and bills are as recorded, shown side by side. They say nothing about why a contribution was made, how a member voted or what a report sought. A bill number written in a report is read as the measure of the Congress its context points to (a law's number, the Congress written next to it, the title), else of the Congress then sitting.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.