Federal contractor · TAMPA, FL

EXCALIBUR ASSOCIATES INC

EXCALIBUR ASSOCIATES INC received $9.4M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (−31% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $128.7M. Its largest customer was Office of the Secretary ($8.9M).

Obligations · FY2026
$9.4M
New awards
6
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
5.6%
UEI
KYC2MM3LNK29
Small businessVeteran-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

3 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $9.4M in FY2026 together.

  1. EXCALIBUR ASSOCIATES INCTAMPA, FL · Family page
    $9.4M
  2. $0
  3. $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 6.2MFY2017
  2. 437.1KFY2018
  3. 558KFY2019
  4. 11.8MFY2020
  5. 18.1MFY2021
  6. 21.1MFY2022
  7. 23.7MFY2023
  8. 23.6MFY2024
  9. 13.7MFY2025
  10. 9.4MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 3 awards
  2. 2 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$8.9M94%
  2. Professional services$530.5K5.6%
  3. Equipment maintenance$36.7K0.4%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition5.6%
    US 39% · $530.5K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions5.6%
    US 8.7% · $530.5K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Office of the Secretary· Montgomery County, MD· Facilities & utilities· Nov 28, 2025 – Jan 28, 2026· 1331L526F13OS0004
  2. Office of the Secretary· District of Columbia, DC· Facilities & utilities· Nov 22, 2023 – Apr 7, 2026· 1331L524F13OS0045
  3. Office of the Secretary· District of Columbia, DC· Facilities & utilities· Nov 29, 2022 – Mar 18, 2026· 1331L523F13OS0052
  4. Office of the Chief Financial Officer· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Mar 28, 2023 – Apr 8, 2026· 12314423F0179
  5. Office of the Chief Financial Officer· Gilmer County, GA· Professional services· Sep 6, 2023 – Jan 6, 2026· 12314423C0065
  6. Department of the Army· Cumberland County, NC· Equipment maintenance· Sep 25, 2023 – Jan 22, 2026· W9124723C0065

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $4.5M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $716.2K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $5.2M reported

  1. CONCORD, MA · 2 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. VISION QUEST SOLUTIONS INC$62.8M+31% in FY2026
    HOT SPRINGS, SD · 46% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of the Chief Financial Officer · Investigation and security servicesArmy · Investigation and security services
  2. COGAR GROUP, LTD., THE$50.5M+28% in FY2026
    ALDIE, VA · 38% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of the Secretary · Investigation and security services
  3. ICRIS, LLC$1.4M+123% in FY2026
    SAN FRANCISCO, CA · 2.7% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of the Secretary · Investigation and security servicesOffice of the Chief Financial Officer · Investigation and security services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.