Federal contractor · COLORADO SPRINGS, CO

FEDERAL CONTRACTING INC

FEDERAL CONTRACTING INC received $139.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 10 awards (+96% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $944.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($139.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$139.3M
New awards
10
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
UXSBJ33DSAH5
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 6.1MFY2017
  2. 34.4MFY2018
  3. 146MFY2019
  4. 31MFY2020
  5. 17.8MFY2021
  6. 159.2MFY2022
  7. 264.4MFY2023
  8. 74.9MFY2024
  9. 71.3MFY2025
  10. 139.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 10 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$139.3M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Ward County, ND· Construction & real property· Mar 17, 2023 – Apr 30, 2026· W9128F23C0009
  2. Department of the Army· Meade County, SD· Construction & real property· Jun 30, 2022 – May 27, 2026· W9128F22C0025
  3. Department of the Army· Meade County, SD· Construction & real property· Jun 1, 2022 – Apr 24, 2026· W9128F22C0024
  4. Department of the Army· Meade County, SD· Construction & real property· Nov 30, 2022 – Apr 16, 2026· W9128F23C0003
  5. Department of the Army· Laramie County, WY· Construction & real property· Jan 30, 2024 – May 29, 2026· W9128F24C0011
  6. Department of the Army· Pennington County, SD· Construction & real property· Sep 19, 2025 – May 26, 2026· W9128F25CA050
  7. Department of the Army· Bexar County, TX· Construction & real property· Apr 21, 2026 – Apr 21, 2026· W9126G26CA018
  8. Department of the Army· Meade County, SD· Construction & real property· Dec 2, 2022 – Mar 19, 2026· W9128F23C0002

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $52.4M (2 subawards)

1 prime

  1. HERNDON, VA · 2 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $414.1K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $52.4M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $52.8M reported

  1. HOUSTON, TX · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. EL SEGUNDO, CA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CERRIS BUILDERS, INC$275.3M+5,442% in FY2026
    PFLUGERVILLE, TX · 96% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building construction
  2. ACC CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.$353M−78% in FY2026
    AUGUSTA, GA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building construction
  3. ARCHER WESTERN FEDERAL JV$397.8M−63% in FY2026
    CHICAGO, IL · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.