Federal contractor · ORLANDO, FL

FEDGOVIT, INC.

FEDGOVIT, INC. received $3.4M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 21 awards (−48% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $133.6M. Its largest customer was Bureau of the Fiscal Service ($1.8M).

Obligations · FY2026
$3.4M
New awards
21
Sole-source
59%
Single offer
5.4%
UEI
PQDGKFF88YK7
Small businessWoman-ownedMinority-owned8(a) program

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 9.4MFY2017
  2. 16.8MFY2018
  3. 13.7MFY2019
  4. 11.7MFY2020
  5. 20.1MFY2021
  6. 10MFY2022
  7. 33.6MFY2023
  8. 8.3MFY2024
  9. 6.5MFY2025
  10. 3.4MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 16 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$2.1M64%
  2. Professional services$1.2M35%
  3. Other equipment & supplies$45.4K1.3%

Where the work was performed

  1. King County, WA$81.4K2.4%
  2. Wood County, WV$37.2K1.1%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition64%
    US 39% · $2.2M
  • Sole-source awards59%
    US 30% · $2M
  • Single-offer competitions5.4%
    US 8.8% · $180.4K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Treasury · 2 awards

Largest awards

  1. Bureau of the Fiscal Service· Santa Clara County, CA· IT & telecom· Nov 18, 2022 – Nov 20, 2025· 2033H623C00002
  2. Bureau of the Fiscal Service· King County, WA· IT & telecom· Aug 27, 2021 – Aug 10, 2026· 2033H621C00005
  3. National Institutes of Health· Orange County, FL· Professional services· Apr 2, 2026 – Apr 2, 2026· 75N98026F00001
  4. Bureau of the Fiscal Service· Orange County, FL· IT & telecom· Nov 2, 2022 – Apr 13, 2026· 2033H623C00001
  5. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration· Suffolk County, NY· IT & telecom· Jun 29, 2022 – Jul 13, 2026· 1305M322FNWWN0097
  6. International Trade Commission· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Aug 5, 2024 – Aug 5, 2026· 34300024P0023
  7. Bureau of the Fiscal Service· Orange County, FL· IT & telecom· Jul 19, 2024 – Jul 20, 2026· 2033H624C00012
  8. Bureau of the Fiscal Service· Orange County, FL· IT & telecom· Oct 1, 2023 – Jun 4, 2026· 2033H624C00002

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $511.4K reported

  1. ARLINGTON, VA · 6 subawards · Other professional, scientific, and technical services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 11 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ANNAPOLIS, MD · 65% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of the Fiscal Service · Computer systems design and related services
  2. ONYX GOVERNMENT SERVICES, LLC$24.5M+16% in FY2026
    CHANTILLY, VA · 65% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of the Fiscal Service · Computer systems design and related services
  3. SENECA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC$36.9M+120% in FY2026
    SALAMANCA, NY · 65% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of the Fiscal Service · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.