Federal contractor · PALO ALTO, CA

FENIX RESEARCH CORP

FENIX RESEARCH CORP received $740.4K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−38% vs FY2025). Since FY2020: $6.7M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($600.4K).

Obligations · FY2026
$740.4K
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
81%
UEI
VFFKM2MKMJM3
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 307.5KFY2020
  2. 750KFY2021
  3. 850KFY2022
  4. 1.3MFY2023
  5. 1.5MFY2024
  6. 1.2MFY2025
  7. 740.4KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$600.4K81%
    1 awards
  2. Department of the Navy$140K19%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$740.4K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Santa Clara County, CA$740.4K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition81%
    US 39% · $600.4K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions81%
    US 8.8% · $600.4K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. SBIR PHASE II$2M
    Department of the Navy· Santa Clara County, CA· Research & development· Oct 4, 2021 – Mar 18, 2026· N6833522C0003
  2. DAPRA SBIR PHASE II EFFORT ENTITLED, MULTI-FACTOR CONTINUOUS AUTHENTICATION.$1.2M
    Department of the Army· Santa Clara County, CA· Research & development· Aug 25, 2025 – Jun 11, 2026· W912CG25CA016
  3. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.$140K
    Department of the Navy· Santa Clara County, CA· Research & development· Oct 15, 2025 – Oct 15, 2025· N6833526C0113

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. AQUAGGA INC$2.5M−100% in FY2026
    TACOMA, WA · 68% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development servicesDefense Advanced Research Projects Agency · Scientific research and development services
  2. WEB SENSING, LLC$5.5M−66% in FY2026
    LEBANON, NH · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Advanced Research Projects Agency · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services
  3. NUMAT TECHNOLOGIES INC$2.2M−83% in FY2026
    SKOKIE, IL · 62% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.