Federal contractor · ARLINGTON, VA

FINANCIAL MARKETS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

FINANCIAL MARKETS INTERNATIONAL, INC. received -$356 in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards. Since FY2017: $62.4M. Its largest customer was Agency for International Development ($0).

Obligations · FY2026
-$356
New awards
3
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
DX83DLMM3Y43
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.5MFY2017
  2. 4.5MFY2018
  3. 2.5MFY2019
  4. 2.5MFY2020
  5. 14.8MFY2021
  6. 5.6MFY2022
  7. 14.8MFY2023
  8. 16.3MFY2024
  9. 0FY2025
  10. -355.8FY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. Agency for International Development· Professional services· Sep 26, 2021 – Aug 17, 2026· 72027821C00002
  2. Agency for International Development· Professional services· Sep 26, 2022 – Aug 18, 2026· 72016822C00001
  3. Millennium Challenge Corporation· Professional services· Aug 5, 2021 – Jun 29, 2026· 95332421C0043

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

FINANCIAL MARKETS INTERNATIONAL, INC. received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 0FY2021

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2021.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $3.8M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2023: $3.1M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $2.6M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $816.3K paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

65 companies · $10.4M reported

  1. DURHAM, NC · 1 subaward · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  2. WASHINGTON, DC · 1 subaward · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  3. THE AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE IN JORDAN$478.4K
    AMMAN, JO · 3 subawards · Other professional, scientific, and technical services

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. LINC LLC$19M−100% in FY2026
    WASHINGTON, DC · 97% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAgency for International Development · Other professional, scientific, and technical servicesAgency for International Development · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. BLUMONT GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT, INC.$14.3M−84% in FY2026
    ARLINGTON, VA · 77% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAgency for International Development · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  3. WASHINGTON, DC · 77% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAgency for International Development · Other professional, scientific, and technical services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.