Federal contractor · HAMILTON, MT

FLAT ROCK CONTRACTING, LLC

FLAT ROCK CONTRACTING, LLC received $130.9K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (−54% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.2M. Its largest customer was Forest Service ($130.9K).

Obligations · FY2026
$130.9K
New awards
4
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
ZMNPN1KLNZR1
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 0FY2017
  2. 53.7KFY2018
  3. 28KFY2020
  4. 104.8KFY2021
  5. 142.5KFY2022
  6. 203.1KFY2023
  7. 232.4KFY2024
  8. 283.3KFY2025
  9. 130.9KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Forest Service$130.9K100%
    4 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$130.9K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Beaverhead County, MT$84.9K65%
  2. St. Louis County, MN$46.1K35%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $130.9K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.8% · $130.9K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. FLAT ROCK CONTRACTING, LLC MTBDF266293 E72$47K
    Forest Service· Beaverhead County, MT· Facilities & utilities· Aug 11, 2026 – Aug 11, 2026· 1202SB26M2541
  2. FLAT ROCK CONTRACTING, LLC MNSUF002393 O227$38.8K
    Forest Service· St. Louis County, MN· Facilities & utilities· Jul 21, 2026 – Jul 21, 2026· 1202SB26M2811
  3. FLAT ROCK CONTRACTING, LLC MTBDF266319 O157$37.9K
    Forest Service· Beaverhead County, MT· Facilities & utilities· Aug 14, 2026 – Aug 14, 2026· 12024B26M1013
  4. FLAT ROCK CONTRACTING, LLC MNSUF002394 O227$7,275
    Forest Service· St. Louis County, MN· Facilities & utilities· Aug 6, 2026 – Aug 6, 2026· 1202SB26M1924

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BILL PAULTON$684.5K−42% in FY2026
    EDGEMONT, SD · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestryBureau of Land Management · Support activities for forestry
  2. SAW LIVIN INC$673.5K−37% in FY2026
    KLAMATH FALLS, OR · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestryBureau of Land Management · Support activities for forestry
  3. SOLOMON FIRE EQUIPMENT, LLC$617.4K−14% in FY2026
    HAVRE, MT · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestryBureau of Land Management · Support activities for forestry

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.