Federal contractor · TALLAHASSEE, FL

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION received $9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 9 awards (+63% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $48M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($3.6M).

Obligations · FY2026
$9M
New awards
9
Sole-source
11%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
LL78DWLKNCM3
Other than small businessGovernment entity
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $9.1M in FY2026 together.

  1. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONTALLAHASSEE, FL · Family page
    $9M
  2. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONTALLAHASSEE, FL
    $114.4K

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 6.3MFY2017
  2. 4.8MFY2018
  3. 3.5MFY2019
  4. 2.1MFY2020
  5. 3.8MFY2021
  6. 4.6MFY2022
  7. 4.8MFY2023
  8. 3.5MFY2024
  9. 5.5MFY2025
  10. 9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Air Force$3.6M40%
    3 awards
  2. Department of the Navy$3.1M35%
    2 awards
  3. Department of the Army$2.2M25%
    4 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$9M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Okaloosa County, FL$3.6M40%
  2. Leon County, FL$2.1M23%
  3. Monroe County, FL$1M11%
  4. Bay County, FL$1M11%
  5. Clay County, FL$603.7K6.7%
  6. Bradford County, FL$584.8K6.5%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition11%
    US 39% · $1M
  • Sole-source awards11%
    US 30% · $1M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. FULL FOOD SERVICES PANAMA CITY$10.4M
    Department of the Navy· Bay County, FL· Facilities & utilities· Sep 23, 2020 – Feb 11, 2026· N6883620C0006
  2. MESS ATTENDANT SERVICES AT HURLBURT FIELD, FL$7.6M
    Department of the Air Force· Okaloosa County, FL· Facilities & utilities· Apr 26, 2021 – Nov 3, 2025· FA441721C0012
  3. 33 FW DINING FACILITY$2.8M
    Department of the Air Force· Okaloosa County, FL· Facilities & utilities· May 29, 2025 – Dec 30, 2025· FA282325C0012
  4. THIS CONTRACT IS FOR MESS ATTENDANT SERVICES AND OTHER SUPPORT SERVICES FOR TWO APPROPRIATED FUNDED (APF) FOOD OPERATIONS, COMPRISED OF ONE PRIMARY DINING FACILITY (DFAC) AND ONE EXPANDED GRAB AND GO KIOSK, AT HURLBURT FIELD, FLORIDA.$2.4M
    Department of the Air Force· Okaloosa County, FL· Facilities & utilities· Aug 12, 2025 – Jan 29, 2026· FA441725C0009
  5. FULL FOOD SERVICES AT THE SEASHORE DINING FACILITY NSA PANAMA CITY$2.1M
    Department of the Navy· Leon County, FL· Facilities & utilities· Mar 27, 2026 – May 28, 2026· N6883626C0003
  6. KEY WEST FULL FOOD SERVICES (FFS)$1.1M
    Department of the Army· Monroe County, FL· Facilities & utilities· May 1, 2025 – Mar 17, 2026· W5168W25FA005
  7. DINING FACILITY FULL FOOD SERVICE (FFS) THIS IS A NON-PERSONAL SERVICES CONTRACT TO PROVIDE DFAC FOOD SERVICE OPERATIONS SUPPORTING THE FLORIDA REGIONAL TRAINING INSTITUTE (RTI) FOR QUARTER 01 FOOD SERVICES.$911.8K
    Department of the Army· Clay County, FL· Facilities & utilities· Sep 14, 2025 – Dec 19, 2025· W911YN25FA018
  8. DINING FACILITY FULL FOOD SERVICE (FFS) THIS IS A NON-PERSONAL SERVICES CONTRACT TO PROVIDE DFAC FOOD SERVICE OPERATIONS SUPPORTING THE FLORIDA REGIONAL TRAINING INSTITUTE (RTI) AT DESIGNATED DINING FACILITY.$584.8K
    Department of the Army· Bradford County, FL· Facilities & utilities· Mar 27, 2026 – Mar 27, 2026· W911YN26FA005

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $156.6M (2 subawards)

1 prime

  1. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES$156.6M100%
    TALLAHASSEE, FL · 2 subawards

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

249 companies · $20B reported

  1. SCHOOL BOARD OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY$2.2B
    MIAMI, FL · 261 subawards
  2. THE SCHOOL BOARD OF BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA$1.2B
    FORT LAUDERDALE, FL · 232 subawards
  3. HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT$1.2B
    TAMPA, FL · 225 subawards

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $158M reported

  1. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES$156.6M
    TALLAHASSEE, FL · 2 subawards
  2. STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF EMERGENCY M$1.4M
    TALLAHASSEE, FL · 4 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MARYLAND STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION$18.6M+5% in FY2026
    BALTIMORE, MD · 2 entities · 65% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Special food servicesArmy · Special food servicesEducation · Scientific research and development services
  2. MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION SERVICE$43.6M+3.4% in FY2026
    MADISON, MS · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Special food servicesNavy · Special food servicesArmy · Special food services
  3. UTAH DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE SERVICES$6.4M+27% in FY2026
    SALT LAKE CITY, UT · 35% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Special food services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.