Federal contractor · GREENVILLE, SC

FLUOR INTERCONTINENTAL, INC

FLUOR INTERCONTINENTAL, INC received $279.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 10 awards (+89% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $4B. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($168M).

Obligations · FY2026
$279.2M
New awards
10
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
32%
UEI
XMJWLE5WFT29
Parent company
FLUOR CORPORATION
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the FLUOR MARINE PROPULSION, LLC company family: 18 registered entities, $7.8B in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. FLUOR MARINE PROPULSION, LLCGREENVILLE, SC · Family page
    $4.2B
  2. SAVANNAH RIVER NUCLEAR SOLUTIONS LLCAIKEN, SC
    $3.4B
  3. FLUOR INTERCONTINENTAL GERMANY GMBHRATINGEN, DEU
    $11.6M
  4. FLUOR FEDERAL SOLUTIONS, LLCRESTON, VA
    $315.6K
  5. FLUOR FEDERAL SOLUTIONS, LLCGREENVILLE, SC
    $202.3K

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 612.6MFY2017
  2. 733.4MFY2018
  3. 795.9MFY2019
  4. 629.7MFY2020
  5. 285.5MFY2021
  6. 313.2MFY2022
  7. 34.6MFY2023
  8. 141.6MFY2024
  9. 147.6MFY2025
  10. 279.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Air Force$168M60%
    4 awards
  2. Department of the Army$111.2M40%
    4 awards
  3. Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%
    1 awards
  4. Defense Threat Reduction Agency$00.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$119.1M43%
  2. Facilities & utilities$90.1M32%
  3. Construction & real property$70M25%
  4. Research & development$5000.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$113.6M41%
  2. Sumter County, SC$90M32%
  3. Bay County, FL$70M25%
  4. Greenville County, SC$5.5M2.0%
  5. Otero County, NM$144.4K0.1%
  6. Madison County, AL$5000.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition32%
    US 39% · $90.1M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions32%
    US 8.8% · $90.1M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. LOGISTICS CIVIL AUGMENTATION PROGRAM (LOGCAP) V SUPPORT SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF AFRICOM.$403M
    Department of the Army· Professional services· Apr 12, 2019 – May 12, 2026· W52P1J19F0403
  2. HAFB OPERATION ALLIES WELCOME (REFUGE) - O21R$352.2M
    Department of the Air Force· Otero County, NM· Facilities & utilities· Aug 23, 2021 – Mar 11, 2026· FA805121F0060
  3. LOGCAP BASE LIFE SUPPORT SERVICES FOR AFRICOM AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY.$263.8M
    Department of the Army· Professional services· Jan 26, 2017 – Mar 27, 2026· 0014
  4. PAVEMENT AND TRANSPORTATION SUPPORT, NORTH FIELD, TINIAN, CNMI$176.9M
    Department of the Air Force· Bay County, FL· Construction & real property· Mar 7, 2024 – May 29, 2026· FA805124F0024
  5. AFCAP V - BASIC CONTRACT FLUOR$100M
    Department of the Air Force· Sumter County, SC· Facilities & utilities· Mar 13, 2026 – Jun 4, 2026· FA805126F0026
  6. LOGISTICS CIVIL AUGMENTATION PROGRAM (LOGCAP) V BASE LIFE SUPPORT AND SUSTAINMENT SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF AIR FORCE SITES AT MANDA BAY, KENYA AND CAMP CHABELLEY, DJIBOUTI.$70.9M
    Department of the Army· Professional services· Sep 23, 2022 – Apr 14, 2026· W52P1J22F0445
  7. BASE OPERATING SUPPORT SERVICES AT ALI AL SALEM AIR BASE KUWAIT.$25.9M
    Department of the Air Force· Professional services· Jan 22, 2024 – Mar 20, 2026· FA805124F0016
  8. LOGISTICS CIVIL AUGMENTATION PROGRAM (LOGCAP) V AWARD FOR AFRICOM SETTING THE THEATER SERVICES.$2.8M
    Department of the Army· Professional services· Apr 12, 2019 – Mar 4, 2026· W52P1J19F0372

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $60.3M (23 subawards)

17 sub-recipients

  1. US OCEAN LLC$33.3M55%
    NEW ORLEANS, LA · 1 subaward
  2. SAKOM SERVICES WI LLC$9.3M15%
    SHAWANO, WI · 1 subaward
  3. TITAN 3PL, LLC$7.5M12%
    GRAPEVINE, TX · 1 subaward
  4. AUSTABILITY PTY LTD$3.3M5.5%
    BARTON, AUS · 1 subaward
  5. FPA PACIFIC CORP.$2.9M4.9%
    TINIAN, MP · 2 subawards
  6. KUWAIT RESOURCES HOUSE FOR HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT AND SERVICES COMPANY K.S.C.C.$1.7M2.8%
    SHARQ, KWT · 1 subaward
  7. EXECUTIVE SHUTTLE SERVICES$873.8K1.4%
    NAIROBI, KEN · 1 subaward
  8. AIM WORLD SERVICES INC$585.7K1.0%
    SPRING, TX · 2 subawards
  9. ULTISAT, INC$187.3K0.3%
    LAUREL, MD · 2 subawards
  10. PACIFIC INK, INC.$125K0.2%
    SOLANA BEACH, CA · 2 subawards

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Its reported sub-contracts equal 22% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $32.4M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2022: $401.7M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2023: $75.2M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $247.6M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $153.2M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2026: $60.3M paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

1,652 companies · $6.1B reported

  1. KIEWIT POWER CONSTRUCTORS CO$1.5B
    LENEXA, KS · 6 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. SHALLOW WATER WORKOVER & DRILLING OPERATIONS, L.L.C.$973.2M
    LAFAYETTE, LA · 52 subawards · Facilities support services
  3. MAHAFFEY TENT & AWNING CO., INC.$168.5M
    MEMPHIS, TN · 1 subaward · Facilities support services

Primes that pay it

7 companies · $63.7M reported

  1. TRIAD NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC$52.5M
    COLUMBUS, OH · 12 subawards · Facilities support services
  2. ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC$6.9M
    PALO ALTO, CA · 1 subaward
  3. CONSOLIDATED NUCLEAR SECURITY, LLC$2M
    FREDERICK, MD · 6 subawards · Facilities support services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 13 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. UT-BATTELLE LLC$8B+3% in FY2026
    OAK RIDGE, TN · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEnergy · Facilities support services
  2. CONSOLIDATED NUCLEAR SECURITY, LLC$9.5B+32% in FY2026
    FREDERICK, MD · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEnergy · Facilities support services
  3. TRIAD NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC$15.9B+5.6% in FY2026
    COLUMBUS, OH · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEnergy · Facilities support services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of FLUOR MARINE PROPULSION, LLC (18 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • FLUOR CORPORATIONAI match · 100%
  • Fluor Enterprises, Inc.AI match · 94%
Lobbying · 2025
$3.1M
48 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$15.4M
$15.4M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$302.5K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$4.3M
    47 reports
  2. 2024$6.1M
    51 reports
  3. 2025$3.1M
    48 reports
  4. 2026$1.9M
    23 reports

Top issues

  1. Energy and nuclear97 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations74 reports
  3. Transportation56 reports
  4. Defense24 reports
  5. Foreign relations18 reports
  6. Disaster planning and emergencies16 reports
  7. Manufacturing14 reports
  8. Accounting12 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. SENATE151 reports
  2. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES148 reports
  3. Transportation - Dept of (DOT)26 reports
  4. Energy - Dept of21 reports
  5. Commerce - Dept of (DOC)13 reports
  6. State - Dept of (DOS)10 reports
  7. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)6 reports
  8. White House Office3 reports
  9. Defense - Dept of (DOD)1 reports
  10. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)1 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. FGS Global (US) LLC (FKA FGH Holdings LLC)$1.3M
    14 reports
  2. OGR$700K
    14 reports
  3. Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough$700K
    14 reports
  4. AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD$600K
    13 reports
  5. O'Keeffe Shahmoradi Strategies, LLC$410K
    14 reports
  6. Mehlman Consulting, Inc.$380K
    14 reports
  7. Neale Creek, LLC$380K
    14 reports
  8. Cassidy & Associates, Inc.$360K
    14 reports

12 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$187.5K62%
  2. Democratic$114K38%
  3. Other or none$1,0000.3%

PACs sponsored

  • FLUOR CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (FLUOR PAC)$454.1K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.