Federal contractor · THORNTON, CO

FORGE NANO, INC.

No contract obligations recorded for FORGE NANO, INC. in FY2026. Since FY2022: $912.4K. It also received $749.4K in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
RGC9JY1ZYG13
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 528.5KFY2022
  2. 0FY2023
  3. 180KFY2024
  4. 203.9KFY2025

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for FORGE NANO, INC. in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

FORGE NANO, INC. received $749.4K in federal assistance in FY2026, on 3 actions (1 new awards). Its largest program was 12.431 · Basic Scientific Research ($749.4K).

Assistance · FY2026
$749.4K
New awards
1
Actions
3
Since FY2021
$3.3M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 2.6MFY2021
  2. 0FY2022
  3. 0FY2023
  4. 0FY2024
  5. 0FY2025
  6. 749.4KFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$749.4K100%

Top programs

  1. 12.431 · Basic Scientific Research$749.4K100%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of the Army$749.4K100%
    Department of Defense

Largest awards

  1. ACCELERATED DEVELOPMENT OF 18650 LIBS WITH HIGH TEMPERATURE PERFORMANCE$749.4K
    12.431 · Basic Scientific Research· Department of the Army· Cooperative agreement· Jul 24, 2026 – Aug 27, 2026· W911NF262A122

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $400K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. SEMICONDUCTOR EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS INTERNATIONAL$400K100%
    SAN JOSE, CA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $186.4K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $131.1K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $339.1K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $800.9K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $702.7K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $400K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

6 companies · $2.6M reported

  1. THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK$816K
    NEW YORK, NY · 3 subawards
  2. SEMI$650K
    MILPITAS, CA · 2 subawards
  3. MOTT CORP$559.4K
    FARMINGTON, CT · 1 subaward

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. AZUL 3D INC$204K−100% in FY2026
    SKOKIE, IL · 53% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development services
  2. EIC LABORATORIES, INC.$215.1K−100% in FY2026
    NORWOOD, MA · 53% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development services
  3. TOWSON UNIVERSITY$338.7K
    BALTIMORE, MD · 53% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Forge Nano, Inc.AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$50K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2025
$320K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$150K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$120K
    2 reports
  3. 2025$50K
    4 reports

Top issues

  1. Manufacturing9 reports
  2. Defense3 reports
  3. Financial institutions, investments and securities2 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES9 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE9 reports
  3. Commerce - Dept of (DOC)3 reports
  4. Energy - Dept of3 reports
  5. Treasury - Dept of2 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. VENN STRATEGIES$270K
    6 reports
  2. Strategic Marketing Innovations$50K
    4 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.