Federal contractor · ONEIDA, NY

FPM-AECOM JV2

FPM-AECOM JV2 received $6.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (−31% vs FY2025). Since FY2024: $35M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($6.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$6.9M
New awards
6
Sole-source
3.3%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
WZHCXMRZ3UF5
Parent company
FPM-AECOM JV1
Small business8(a) programNative-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the FPM-AECOM JV1 company family: 2 registered entities, $8.8M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. FPM-AECOM JV1ONEIDA, NY · Family page
    $1.9M

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 18.3MFY2024
  2. 9.9MFY2025
  3. 6.9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 5 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$6.1M89%
  2. Construction & real property$757.2K11%

Where the work was performed

  1. Kent County, DE$227.6K3.3%
  2. King County, WA$2,5000.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition3.4%
    US 39% · $230.1K
  • Sole-source awards3.3%
    US 30% · $227.6K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $2,500
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· San Bernardino County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Sep 18, 2025 – Mar 13, 2026· W912DY25FA174
  2. Department of the Army· Maricopa County, AZ· Facilities & utilities· Dec 10, 2024 – May 14, 2026· W912PL25C0002
  3. Department of the Air Force· Fairbanks North Star Borough, AK· Construction & real property· May 13, 2026 – May 13, 2026· FA500426C0021
  4. Department of the Army· Kent County, DE· Construction & real property· Sep 27, 2025 – May 29, 2026· W912BU25C0039
  5. Department of the Army· King County, WA· Facilities & utilities· Mar 24, 2026 – Mar 24, 2026· W912DW26FA037
  6. Department of the Army· Jackson County, MO· Facilities & utilities· Oct 20, 2025 – Oct 20, 2025· W912DQ26FA005

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

8 companies · $709.4K reported

  1. MELBOURNE, FL · 2 subawards · Remediation and other waste management services
  2. PORTSMOUTH, NH · 1 subaward · Remediation and other waste management services
  3. MICHIGAN DISPOSAL, INC.$102.8K
    BELLEVILLE, MI · 1 subaward · Remediation and other waste management services

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. NORCROSS, GA · 5 entities · 88% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Remediation and other waste management servicesAir Force · Remediation and other waste management services
  2. ONEIDA ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC$64.3M−81% in FY2026
    MILWAUKEE, WI · 70% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Remediation and other waste management servicesAir Force · Remediation and other waste management services
  3. BAY WEST LLC$47.5M−85% in FY2026
    SAINT PAUL, MN · 62% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Remediation and other waste management servicesAir Force · Remediation and other waste management services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.