Federal contractor · ALEXANDRIA, VA

G.M. HILL ENGINEERING, INC.

No contract obligations recorded for G.M. HILL ENGINEERING, INC. in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
K4AQPXHTK5N4
Parent company
G.M. HILL ENGINEERING, INC.
Small businessWoman-owned8(a) program
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the G.M. HILL ENGINEERING, INC. company family: 2 registered entities, $8.3M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. G.M. HILL ENGINEERING, INC.JACKSONVILLE, FL · Family page
    $8.3M

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 5KFY2021

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for G.M. HILL ENGINEERING, INC. in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $400.3K reported

  1. CDM FEDERAL PROGRAMS CORPORATION$400.3K
    FAIRFAX, VA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 12 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. DESIGN ALASKA, INC.$16.4M+23% in FY2026
    FAIRBANKS, AK · 41% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. WESTEAST DESIGN GROUP, LLC$12.4M−59% in FY2026
    SAN ANTONIO, TX · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. ANGELS GENERAL CONSTRUCTION INC$14.1M−21% in FY2026
    DETROIT, MI · 38% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building constructionU.S. Coast Guard · Nonresidential building construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.