Federal contractor · MCLEAN, VA

GARDAWORLD FEDERAL

GARDAWORLD FEDERAL received $2.4M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (+17% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $32M. Its largest customer was Department of State ($2.4M).

Obligations · FY2026
$2.4M
New awards
1
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
JBWBLEJ4APN8
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the GARDAWORLD FEDERAL SERVICES LLC company family: 4 registered entities, $599.9M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. GARDAWORLD FEDERAL SERVICES LLCARLINGTON, VA · Family page
    $585.1M
  2. GARDAWORLD FEDERAL NIGERIAMCLEAN, VA
    $8.9M
  3. GARDAWORLD-TRANSGUARD GROUP UAEMCLEAN, VA
    $3.5M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 7.6MFY2017
  2. 0FY2018
  3. 3.9MFY2019
  4. 3MFY2020
  5. 3.8MFY2021
  6. 3.2MFY2022
  7. 1.8MFY2023
  8. 4.2MFY2024
  9. 2.1MFY2025
  10. 2.4MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of State$2.4M100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$2.4M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$2.4M100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. AWARD - LOCAL GUARD MISSION ERBIL$32M
    Department of State· Facilities & utilities· Jul 28, 2017 – Jul 9, 2026· SAQMMA17C0237

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $1.9M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $3.5M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

5 companies · $169.8M reported

  1. KBR SERVICES, LLC$100.7M
    HOUSTON, TX · 5 subawards · Facilities support services
  2. V2X SYSTEMS LLC$44M
    COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 3 subawards · Facilities support services
  3. AMENTUM SERVICES, INC.$15.1M
    CHANTILLY, VA · 5 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 8 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. INTER-CON SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC.$538.5M−6.8% in FY2026
    PASADENA, CA · 42% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveState · Investigation and security services
  2. ACQUISITION LOGISTICS LLC$876.6M+131% in FY2026
    HENRICO, VA · 40% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. TRIPLE CANOPY INC$1.2B−11% in FY2026
    HERNDON, VA · 43% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveState · Investigation and security servicesArmy · Investigation and security services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.