Federal contractor · STAMFORD, CT

GARTNER, INC.

GARTNER, INC. received $38.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 163 awards (−37% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.1B. Its largest customer was Office of the Secretary ($5.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$38.5M
New awards
163
Sole-source
3.3%
Single offer
36%
UEI
CFALLJBGZ697
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

4 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $38.8M in FY2026 together.

  1. GARTNER, INC.STAMFORD, CT · Family page
    $38.5M
  2. SHL US LLCMINNEAPOLIS, MN
    $359.3K
  3. $0
  4. CEB INC.WASHINGTON, DC
    $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 61.7MFY2017
  2. 74.5MFY2018
  3. 105.9MFY2019
  4. 122.8MFY2020
  5. 136.3MFY2021
  6. 147.7MFY2022
  7. 187.9MFY2023
  8. 187.6MFY2024
  9. 61.2MFY2025
  10. 38.5MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 19 awards
  2. 16 awards
  3. 9 awards
  4. 9 awards
  5. 12 awards
  6. 6 awards
  7. 8 awards
  8. 7 awards
  9. 1 awards
  10. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$22.7M59%
  2. IT & telecom$15.1M39%
  3. Other equipment & supplies$643.1K1.7%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition39%
    US 39% · $15M
  • Sole-source awards3.3%
    US 30% · $1.3M
  • Single-offer competitions36%
    US 8.8% · $13.8M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Agriculture · 1 awards
  2. Department of Transportation · 1 awards
  3. Department of Justice · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs· Western Connecticut Planning Region, CT· Professional services· Aug 1, 2022 – Aug 27, 2026· 36C10A22F0165
  2. Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency· Prince William County, VA· IT & telecom· Sep 13, 2023 – Oct 30, 2025· HS002123F0072
  3. Department of the Navy· Western Connecticut Planning Region, CT· Professional services· Oct 28, 2021 – Apr 16, 2026· N6523622F0018
  4. Office of the Secretary· Prince George's County, MD· Professional services· Jul 30, 2026 – Sep 21, 2026· 1331L526F0307
  5. Bureau of Engraving and Printing· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Nov 30, 2023 – Nov 19, 2025· 2031ZB24F00007
  6. U.S. Coast Guard· Fairfax County, VA· IT & telecom· Sep 27, 2024 – Sep 2, 2026· 70Z07924FBOD40001
  7. Department of State· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Mar 28, 2024 – Mar 10, 2026· 19AQMM24F0581
  8. Office of the Secretary· Prince George's County, MD· Professional services· Jul 28, 2025 – Apr 16, 2026· 1331L525F13230092

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $5M (11 subawards)

6 primes

  1. COLUMBUS, OH · 4 subawards
  2. KANSAS CITY, MO · 3 subawards
  3. GREENVILLE, SC · 1 subaward
  4. CHANTILLY, VA · 1 subaward
  5. MC LEAN, VA · 1 subaward
  6. FAIRFAX, VA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $3.4M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $4.9M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $5.5M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $8.5M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $6.4M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $5M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

24 companies · $33.7M reported

  1. ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 19 subawards · Facilities support services
  2. CHANTILLY, VA · 17 subawards · Wired telecommunications carriers
  3. GREENVILLE, SC · 9 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 152 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ARCHITECHTURE SOLUTIONS LLC$95.7M−27% in FY2026
    FAIRFAX, VA · 29% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Computer systems design and related servicesVeterans Affairs · Computer systems design and related servicesNavy · Computer systems design and related services+15 more
  2. AGILE-BOT II LLC$110M−25% in FY2026
    RESTON, VA · 2 entities · 28% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Computer systems design and related servicesNavy · Computer systems design and related servicesDefense Information Systems Agency · Computer systems design and related services+1 more
  3. COLLEGE PARK, MD · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Computer systems design and related servicesNavy · Computer systems design and related servicesDefense Information Systems Agency · Computer systems design and related services+14 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of GARTNER, INC. (4 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Gartner, Inc.AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$90K
3 reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2025$90K
    3 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense3 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES3 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE3 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. J.A. Green and Company (formerly LLC)$90K
    3 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: AI name judgments (entity-match@1, jev-1.13.0), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.