Federal contractor · NOUAKCHOTT

GECOBA

GECOBA received $34.7K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−99% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $25.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($34.7K).

Obligations · FY2026
$34.7K
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
HBVEAXH6MWU4
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.9MFY2017
  2. 7.4MFY2018
  3. 3.4MFY2019
  4. 2.7MFY2020
  5. 302.7KFY2021
  6. 5.5KFY2022
  7. 2.6MFY2023
  8. 1.3MFY2024
  9. 5.3MFY2025
  10. 34.7KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$34.7K100%
    1 awards
  2. Department of the Navy$00.0%
    1 awards
  3. Department of the Air Force$00.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$34.7K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$34.7K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. LSA ATFP PERIMETER UPGRADE$1.6M
    Department of the Air Force· Construction & real property· Sep 8, 2025 – Oct 20, 2025· FA542225C0021
  2. JOINT OPERATIONS ADMIN BUILDING$943.8K
    Department of the Navy· Construction & real property· Sep 9, 2024 – Mar 6, 2026· N3319124C0013
  3. ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING RENOVATION$261.2K
    Department of the Army· Construction & real property· Sep 19, 2023 – Oct 31, 2025· W912GB23C0030

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. QSJV, LLC$3.7M−24% in FY2026
    RAPID CITY, SD · 56% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Other heavy and civil engineering construction
  2. DPEC & RCS JOINT VENTURE, LLC$3M−39% in FY2026
    EAGLE BUTTE, SD · 45% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Other heavy and civil engineering construction
  3. LEC SOLUTIONS JV, LLC$2.2M−87% in FY2026
    TUCSON, AZ · 34% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Other heavy and civil engineering construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.