Federal contractor · ANCHORAGE, AK

GEOTEK ALASKA INC

GEOTEK ALASKA INC received $887.6K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (+142% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $3.1M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($917.5K).

Obligations · FY2026
$887.6K
New awards
5
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
1.5%
UEI
CYDTJGJJUHD7
Parent company
GEOTEK ALASKA INC
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 42.6KFY2017
  2. 469.3KFY2018
  3. 579.8KFY2019
  4. -52KFY2020
  5. -9.1KFY2021
  6. 474KFY2022
  7. 131KFY2023
  8. 249KFY2024
  9. 366.2KFY2025
  10. 887.6KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 4 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$887.6K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition1.5%
    US 39% · $13K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions1.5%
    US 8.7% · $13K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Anchorage Municipality, AK· Facilities & utilities· Mar 11, 2026 – May 19, 2026· W911KB26FA023
  2. Department of the Army· Fairbanks North Star Borough, AK· Facilities & utilities· Mar 10, 2026 – Mar 10, 2026· W911KB26FA022
  3. Federal Highway Administration· Denali Borough, AK· Facilities & utilities· Apr 8, 2025 – May 14, 2026· 69056725F00023N
  4. Department of the Army· Aleutians West Census Area, AK· Facilities & utilities· May 21, 2026 – May 21, 2026· W911KB26FA051
  5. Department of the Army· Honolulu County, HI· Facilities & utilities· Jun 13, 2025 – Oct 28, 2025· W911KB25F0054

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $281.7K (2 subawards)

2 primes

  1. ARLINGTON, VA · 1 subaward
  2. HUNT VALLEY, MD · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $3.5M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $935.6K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $1M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $1.9M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $490K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $281.7K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

7 companies · $8.2M reported

  1. LOS ANGELES, CA · 8 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. ENGLEWOOD, CO · 16 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. GERMANTOWN, MD · 14 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BRAZORIA, TX · 75% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other specialty trade contractors
  2. LAPEER, MI · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other specialty trade contractors
  3. TTP CONTRACTING GROUP, INC.$1.4M−67% in FY2026
    DALLAS, TX · 75% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other specialty trade contractors

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.