Federal contractor · SEOUL

GICELLPHONE CORP.

GICELLPHONE CORP. received $386.1K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 48 awards (−57% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $8.5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($338.8K).

Obligations · FY2026
$386.1K
New awards
48
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
USYAQK2N33Y4
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.3MFY2017
  2. 1.6MFY2018
  3. 861.7KFY2019
  4. 659KFY2020
  5. 469.4KFY2021
  6. 335.2KFY2022
  7. 259.3KFY2023
  8. 684KFY2024
  9. 897.4KFY2025
  10. 386.1KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 41 awards
  2. 7 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$338.8K88%
  2. Professional services$47.4K12%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$386.1K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· IT & telecom· Dec 8, 2025 – Dec 8, 2025· W91QVN26FA132
  2. Department of the Army· IT & telecom· Dec 29, 2025 – Dec 29, 2025· W91QVN26FA156
  3. Department of the Army· IT & telecom· Jan 31, 2026 – Jan 31, 2026· W90VN926FA050
  4. Department of the Army· IT & telecom· Dec 18, 2025 – Dec 18, 2025· W91QVN26FA159
  5. Department of the Army· IT & telecom· Mar 11, 2025 – Feb 4, 2026· W91QVN25FA129
  6. Department of the Army· IT & telecom· Apr 6, 2026 – Apr 14, 2026· W91QVN26FA352
  7. Department of the Army· IT & telecom· Dec 12, 2025 – Dec 12, 2025· W91QVN26FA139
  8. Department of the Army· IT & telecom· Mar 9, 2025 – May 21, 2026· W91QVN25FA116

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ALPHARETTA, GA · 53% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Motion picture and video industries
  2. VIFS SOLUTIONS INC$2.2M−43% in FY2026
    ELIZABETH CITY, NC · 54% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Motion picture and video industries
  3. 101 GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LTD$760.8K+74% in FY2026
    DUBAI, ARE · 24% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other telecommunications

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.