Federal contractor · PROVIDENCE, RI

GILBANE-EXYTE A JOINT VENTURE

GILBANE-EXYTE A JOINT VENTURE received $2.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−45% vs FY2025). Since FY2022: $287.2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($2.1M).

Obligations · FY2026
$2.1M
New awards
1
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
FNFYEZXNGWF5
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 193MFY2022
  2. 20.6MFY2023
  3. 67.6MFY2024
  4. 3.8MFY2025
  5. 2.1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$2.1M100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$2.1M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Middlesex County, MA$2.1M100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. CONSTRUCTION OF ADVANCED COMPOUND SEMICONDUCTOR LABORATORY/MICROSYSTEM INTEGRATION FACILITY (CSL-MIF) HANSCOM AIR FORCE BASE, BEDFORD,MA$289.7M
    Department of the Army· Middlesex County, MA· Construction & real property· Jan 27, 2022 – Jun 10, 2026· W912WJ22C0002

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $2.6M (3 subawards)

3 sub-recipients

  1. PERFORMANCE CONTRACTING INC$1.9M72%
    LENEXA, KS · 1 subaward
  2. BRANDSAFWAY SERVICES LLC$639.6K24%
    ATLANTA, GA · 1 subaward
  3. HOWDEN USA CO$111.7K4.2%
    WINDSOR, CT · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Its reported sub-contracts equal 125% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $62.7M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2023: $53.1M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $1M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $6.7M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2026: $2.6M paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

25 companies · $126.1M reported

  1. WAYNE J GRIFFIN ELECTRIC INC$31.9M
    HOLLISTON, MA · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction
  2. ARDEN ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTORS, LLC$26.9M
    PAWTUCKET, RI · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction
  3. THE DOW COMPANY, INC.$25.8M
    DRACUT, MA · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. WATTERSON CONSTRUCTION CO$75.3M−71% in FY2026
    ANCHORAGE, AK · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building construction
  2. TOKYU CONSTRUCTION CO., LTD.$73.8M+830% in FY2026
    TOKYO, JPN · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building construction
  3. SEONG BO CONST.IND.CO.,LTD.$68.7M−82% in FY2026
    SEOUL, KOR · 93% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.