Federal contractor · NEW YORK, NY

GLENCORE LTD.

GLENCORE LTD. received $210.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards. Since FY2020: $211.4M. Its largest customer was Defense Logistics Agency ($210.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$210.3M
New awards
1
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
ENEFFREANSB3
Parent company
GLENCORE PLC
Other than small businessForeign-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.2MFY2020
  2. 210.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$210.3M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $210.3M
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $210.3M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Defense Logistics Agency· New York County, NY· Other equipment & supplies· May 15, 2026 – May 15, 2026· SP800026F0024

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

GLENCORE LTD. received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0
Since FY2022
$0

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 0FY2022
  2. 0FY2023
  3. 0FY2025

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2022–FY2025.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. NILES, OH · 26% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Nonferrous metal (except aluminum) production and processing
  2. SOUTH JORDAN, UT · 25% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Nonferrous metal (except aluminum) production and processing
  3. GLOBAL ADVANCED METALS USA INC$49.3M+159% in FY2026
    BOYERTOWN, PA · 23% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Nonferrous metal (except aluminum) production and processing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Glencore Ltd.AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$820K
12 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$2.9M
$2.9M in its own reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$630K
    8 reports
  2. 2024$770K
    11 reports
  3. 2025$820K
    12 reports
  4. 2026$640K
    8 reports

Top issues

  1. Energy and nuclear39 reports
  2. Environment and Superfund25 reports
  3. Foreign relations23 reports
  4. Trade (domestic and foreign)23 reports
  5. Commodities (big ticket)13 reports
  6. Natural resources13 reports
  7. Fuel, gas and oil1 reports
  8. Manufacturing1 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. SENATE37 reports
  2. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES36 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. McLarty Inbound LLC$910K
    12 reports
  2. BGR Government Affairs$670K
    9 reports
  3. Michael Best Strategies LLC$150K
    1 reports
  4. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP$110K
    2 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.