Federal contractor · NORTH HAMPTON, NH

GLOBAFONE INC

GLOBAFONE INC received $286.2K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 17 awards (−18% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $3.2M. Its largest customer was Department of Energy ($134.8K).

Obligations · FY2026
$286.2K
New awards
17
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
5.6%
UEI
J45HNME3SFN3
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 320.9KFY2017
  2. 278KFY2018
  3. 226.5KFY2019
  4. 224.5KFY2020
  5. 265.6KFY2021
  6. 369.1KFY2022
  7. 404.9KFY2023
  8. 440.5KFY2024
  9. 349.3KFY2025
  10. 286.2KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 5 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 1 awards
  6. 1 awards
  7. 1 awards
  8. 1 awards
  9. 1 awards
  10. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$271.1K95%
  2. Professional services$15.1K5.3%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition5.6%
    US 39% · $16.1K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions5.6%
    US 8.8% · $16.1K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of Energy· Montgomery County, MD· IT & telecom· May 27, 2026 – May 27, 2026· 89233126PNA000217
  2. Bureau of Reclamation· Rockingham County, NH· IT & telecom· Dec 21, 2021 – Sep 11, 2026· 140R8122F0032
  3. Indian Health Service· Maricopa County, AZ· IT & telecom· Aug 20, 2021 – Aug 25, 2026· 75H71221F80181
  4. Bureau of Land Management· Humboldt County, NV· Professional services· May 22, 2024 – Apr 28, 2026· 140L3924F0031
  5. Department of Energy· Rockingham County, NH· IT & telecom· Apr 24, 2025 – Mar 18, 2026· 89503025FWA401019
  6. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management· Rockingham County, NH· IT & telecom· Mar 24, 2021 – Aug 19, 2026· 140M0121F0018
  7. Bureau of Land Management· Rockingham County, NH· IT & telecom· May 29, 2025 – May 29, 2026· 140L3725F0129

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $25.5K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. GREENVILLE, SC · 1 subaward

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $25.5K reported

  1. GREENVILLE, SC · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 16 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. PEARCE, AZ · 7.5% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEnergy · Satellite telecommunications
  2. DERWOOD, MD · 5.9% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Customs and Border Protection · Satellite telecommunications
  3. ISOTROPIC NETWORKS, INC$177.5K−49% in FY2026
    LAKE GENEVA, WI · 5.9% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Customs and Border Protection · Satellite telecommunications

Showing the top 3 of 16 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.