Federal contractor · CONSTANTA

GLOBAL DEFENSE LOGISTICS S.R.L.

GLOBAL DEFENSE LOGISTICS S.R.L. received $6.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 58 awards (−71% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $233.2M. Its largest customer was Defense Logistics Agency ($5.9M).

Obligations · FY2026
$6.8M
New awards
58
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
DWGCRSAUWPY1
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 11.4MFY2017
  2. 12.9MFY2018
  3. 12.4MFY2019
  4. 17.4MFY2020
  5. 16.8MFY2021
  6. 45.2MFY2022
  7. 36.7MFY2023
  8. 50.3MFY2024
  9. 23.3MFY2025
  10. 6.8MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 57 awards
  2. USTRANSCOM$827.5K12%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Fuel$5.9M88%
  2. Transportation & logistics$827.5K12%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$6.8M100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. USTRANSCOM· Transportation & logistics· Mar 12, 2026 – Mar 12, 2026· HTC71126F7193
  2. Defense Logistics Agency· Fuel· Dec 26, 2025 – Dec 26, 2025· SPE60826FA221
  3. Defense Logistics Agency· Fuel· Jan 10, 2026 – Jan 10, 2026· SPE60826FA225
  4. Defense Logistics Agency· Fuel· Feb 5, 2026 – Feb 5, 2026· SPE60826FA281
  5. Defense Logistics Agency· Fuel· Jan 5, 2026 – Jan 5, 2026· SPE60826FA240
  6. Defense Logistics Agency· Fuel· Oct 2, 2025 – Oct 2, 2025· SPE60826FA005
  7. Defense Logistics Agency· Fuel· Feb 16, 2026 – Feb 16, 2026· SPE60826FA287
  8. Defense Logistics Agency· Fuel· Feb 11, 2026 – Feb 11, 2026· SPE60826FA278

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 10 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. DUBAI, ARE · 57% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Support activities for water transportationNavy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesU.S. Coast Guard · Support activities for water transportation
  2. MORAN TOWING CORPORATION$70.7M−42% in FY2026
    NEW CANAAN, CT · 56% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Support activities for water transportation
  3. PARSH MARINE (S) PTE. LTD.$28.4M−46% in FY2026
    SINGAPORE, SGP · 35% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Support activities for water transportationNavy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesU.S. Coast Guard · Support activities for water transportation

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.