Federal contractor · JACKSONVILLE, FL

GMHILL BAKER JV, LLC

GMHILL BAKER JV, LLC received $981.5K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 10 awards (−88% vs FY2025). Since FY2023: $12.7M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($590.5K).

Obligations · FY2026
$981.5K
New awards
10
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
60%
UEI
W27AFA7JKSW5
Small businessWoman-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 500FY2023
  2. 3.5MFY2024
  3. 8.2MFY2025
  4. 981.5KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 7 awards
  2. 2 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$981.5K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition60%
    US 39% · $589K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions60%
    US 8.7% · $589K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· Solano County, CA· Construction & real property· Sep 17, 2025 – Jan 23, 2026· FA890325F0225
  2. Department of the Air Force· Maricopa County, AZ· Construction & real property· Sep 5, 2025 – Dec 11, 2025· FA890325F0199
  3. Department of the Army· Duval County, FL· Construction & real property· Sep 27, 2024 – Feb 24, 2026· W912QR24F0345
  4. Department of the Army· Coryell County, TX· Construction & real property· Sep 30, 2024 – Nov 21, 2025· W912QR24F0329
  5. Department of the Army· Roosevelt County, MT· Construction & real property· Aug 6, 2025 – Jan 23, 2026· W9128F25FA100
  6. Department of the Army· El Paso County, CO· Construction & real property· Sep 22, 2025 – May 31, 2026· W9128F25FA184
  7. Department of the Army· Cascade County, MT· Construction & real property· Sep 17, 2025 – May 15, 2026· W50S7L25FA006
  8. Department of the Army· Duval County, FL· Construction & real property· Oct 30, 2025 – Oct 30, 2025· W912HN26FA002

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. OTIE-MERRICK JV LLC$12.1M+64% in FY2026
    MILWAUKEE, WI · 81% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. DESIGN ALASKA, INC.$16.4M+23% in FY2026
    FAIRBANKS, AK · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. WESTEAST DESIGN GROUP, LLC$12.4M−59% in FY2026
    SAN ANTONIO, TX · 75% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.