Federal contractor · HORSHAM, PA

GOLD STANDARD DIAGNOSTICS HORSHAM, LLC

GOLD STANDARD DIAGNOSTICS HORSHAM, LLC received $219.6K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 8 awards (+14% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.4M. Its largest customer was Environmental Protection Agency ($153.5K).

Obligations · FY2026
$219.6K
New awards
8
Sole-source
49%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
RJQDDAJ66GN3
Parent company
EUROFINS SCIENTIFIC SE GROUP
Other than small businessForeign-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the EUROFINS FOOD CHEMISTRY TESTING MADISON, INC company family: 16 registered entities, $519.5K in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. $85.1K
  2. $121.2K
  3. $58.8K
  4. $43.5K
  5. $13.6K

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 79.5KFY2017
  2. 160.2KFY2018
  3. 111.5KFY2020
  4. 58.8KFY2021
  5. 42.4KFY2022
  6. 168.8KFY2023
  7. 345.1KFY2024
  8. 192.2KFY2025
  9. 219.6KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 4 awards
  2. 3 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$219.6K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition49%
    US 39% · $107.9K
  • Sole-source awards49%
    US 30% · $108.2K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · -$312
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Interior · 3 awards
  2. Environmental Protection Agency · 1 awards
  3. Department of Commerce · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Environmental Protection Agency· Middlesex County, MA· Other equipment & supplies· Jul 1, 2026 – Jul 1, 2026· 68HE0126P0031
  2. Environmental Protection Agency· Wyandotte County, KS· Other equipment & supplies· Aug 3, 2026 – Aug 3, 2026· 68HE0726P0318
  3. Environmental Protection Agency· Pontotoc County, OK· Other equipment & supplies· Aug 24, 2026 – Aug 24, 2026· 68HE0626P0026
  4. U.S. Geological Survey· Douglas County, KS· Other equipment & supplies· Mar 17, 2026 – Mar 17, 2026· 140G0226F0101
  5. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration· Montgomery County, PA· Other equipment & supplies· May 5, 2026 – May 5, 2026· 1305M326P0091
  6. U.S. Geological Survey· Douglas County, KS· Other equipment & supplies· Jun 10, 2026 – Jun 10, 2026· 140G0226F0175
  7. Environmental Protection Agency· Jefferson County, CO· Other equipment & supplies· Aug 19, 2020 – Mar 5, 2026· 68HE0820P0027
  8. U.S. Geological Survey· Douglas County, KS· Other equipment & supplies· May 28, 2026 – May 28, 2026· 140G0226F0161

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

33 companies · $13.4M reported

  1. HOUSTON, TX · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. HUNT VALLEY, MD · 21 subawards · Remediation and other waste management services
  3. PASADENA, CA · 10 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 22 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SAN DIEGO, CA · 21% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAgricultural Research Service · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAgricultural Research Service · Scientific research and development services
  2. STEPHENVILLE, TX · 19% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAgricultural Research Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. ATLAS CONTRACTING SOLUTIONS LLC$883.8K+1,240% in FY2026
    NEW YORK, NY · 19% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAgricultural Research Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.