Federal contractor · RESTON, VA

GOOGLE PUBLIC SECTOR LLC

GOOGLE PUBLIC SECTOR LLC received $34.4M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 12 awards (+239% vs FY2025). Since FY2023: $52.8M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($26.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$34.4M
New awards
12
Sole-source
11%
Single offer
79%
UEI
N424F1LU4FK3
Parent company
MANDIANT, INC.
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the AARDVARK company family: 3 registered entities, $54.6M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. AARDVARKLA VERNE, CA · Family page
    $11M
  2. GOOGLE LLCMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA
    $9.1M

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 3.9MFY2023
  2. 4.4MFY2024
  3. 10.2MFY2025
  4. 34.4MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 7 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 1 awards
  6. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$34.4M100.0%
  2. Research & development$5000.0%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition91%
    US 39% · $31.2M
  • Sole-source awards11%
    US 30% · $3.9M
  • Single-offer competitions79%
    US 8.7% · $27.4M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Homeland Security · 1 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Fairfax County, VA· IT & telecom· Sep 12, 2025 – Mar 30, 2026· W519TC25FA214
  2. Defense Information Systems Agency· Fairfax County, VA· IT & telecom· Dec 8, 2022 – May 21, 2026· HC105023F0005
  3. Defense Information Systems Agency· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Jun 8, 2026 – Jun 8, 2026· HC105026F0018
  4. Defense Information Systems Agency· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Aug 7, 2025 – May 26, 2026· HC105025F0041
  5. Department of the Air Force· Fairfax County, VA· IT & telecom· Jan 13, 2026 – Apr 3, 2026· FA872626FB006
  6. Defense Information Systems Agency· Franklin County, PA· IT & telecom· Mar 23, 2023 – Mar 19, 2026· HC105023F0006
  7. Office of Procurement Operations· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Sep 28, 2026 – Sep 28, 2026· 70RTAC26FR0000059
  8. Defense Information Systems Agency· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Mar 14, 2025 – Apr 8, 2026· HC105025F0015

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $177.1K (2 subawards)

1 prime

  1. MCLEAN, VA · 2 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $50K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $177.1K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

6 companies · $5.6M reported

  1. SCOTTSDALE, AZ · 23 subawards · Apparel accessories and other apparel manufacturing
  2. PAULSON MANUFACTURING CORP.$1.7M
    TEMECULA, CA · 9 subawards · Other miscellaneous manufacturing
  3. RAWLINGS SPORTING GOODS COMPANY, INC.$461.5K
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 5 subawards · Apparel accessories and other apparel manufacturing

Primes that pay it

6 companies · $22.3M reported

  1. ARLINGTON, VA · 2 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. CHANTILLY, VA · 2 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. ARLINGTON, VA · 16 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 39 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BYTECUBED, LLC$34.2M+73% in FY2026
    CHEVY CHASE, MD · 34% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Data processing, hosting, and related services
  2. BLACK CAPE, INC.$72.4M+282% in FY2026
    ARLINGTON, VA · 34% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Data processing, hosting, and related services
  3. CAELUM RESEARCH CORPORATION$94.5M−20% in FY2026
    ROCKVILLE, MD · 34% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Data processing, hosting, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of AARDVARK (3 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • GOOGLE LLCAI match · 94%
Lobbying · 2026
$80K
2 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$220K
PAC giving · 2026
$862.4K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$60K
    2 reports
  2. 2025$80K
    2 reports
  3. 2026$80K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Science and technology4 reports
  2. Computer industry2 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES2 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE2 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. RUBIN, TURNBULL & ASSOCIATES$160K
    4 reports
  2. Crossroads Strategies, LLC$60K
    2 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$465K54%
  2. Democratic$382.4K44%
  3. Other or none$15K1.7%

PACs sponsored

  • GOOGLE LLC NETPAC$1.5M raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.