Federal contractor · FRANKFORT, MI

GRACELAND FRUIT INC

GRACELAND FRUIT INC received -$5,716 in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−100% vs FY2025). Since FY2018: $33.5M. Its largest customer was Agricultural Marketing Service (-$5,716).

Obligations · FY2026: -$5,716
New awards: 2
Sole-source: —
Single offer: —

UEI: DU2LK4TCGUJ6
Parent company: OTSUKA HOLDINGS CO.,LTD.

Small business

Open in the contracts explorer Relationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

3 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $12.1K in FY2026 together.

GRACELAND FRUIT INCFRANKFORT, MI · Family page
Reported parent-$5,716
CAMBRIDGE ISOTOPE LABORATORIES, INCANDOVER, MA
Reported parent$90.2K
OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INCROCKVILLE, MD
Reported parent-$72.3K

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

802.1KFY2018
10.6MFY2019
3.5MFY2020
15.5MFY2023
-2.1MFY2024
5.2MFY2025
-5.7KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

Agricultural Marketing Service-$5,7160.0%
2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

COMMODITIES FOR USG FOOD DONATIONS: 2000009329/4100027747/CHERRIES DRIED PKG-8/2 LB$8.4M
Agricultural Marketing Service· Benzie County, MI· Other equipment & supplies· Jun 2, 2023 – Feb 17, 2026· 123J1423C1552
COMMODITIES FOR USG FOOD DONATIONS: 2000010707/4100031995/CHERRIES DRIED PKG-8/2 LB$2.9M
Agricultural Marketing Service· Benzie County, MI· Other equipment & supplies· Apr 8, 2025 – Oct 7, 2025· 123J1425C0986

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

GRACELAND FRUIT INC received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 1 actions (1 new awards). Its largest program was 31.007 · Export - Loan Guarantee/Insured Loans ($0).

Assistance · FY2026: $0
Loan face value: $10M; lent or guaranteed
Actions: 1
Since FY2021: $20K

Assistance by fiscal year

0FY2021
20KFY2022
0FY2023
0FY2024
0FY2025
0FY2026

By type

Loans$00.0%
$10M lent or guaranteed

Top programs

31.007 · Export - Loan Guarantee/Insured Loans$00.0%

Awarding agencies

Export-Import Bank of the United States$00.0%

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $89K reported

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$45K
ANN ARBOR, MI · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$44K
LEXINGTON, MA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 8 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

CAHOON FARMS INC$3.2M
WOLCOTT, NY · 50% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAgricultural Marketing Service · Fruit and vegetable preserving and specialty food manufacturing
LION RAISINS INC$3.3M
SELMA, CA · 50% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAgricultural Marketing Service · Fruit and vegetable preserving and specialty food manufacturing
J. G. BOSWELL COMPANY$3.5M+36% in FY2026
PASADENA, CA · 50% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAgricultural Marketing Service · Fruit and vegetable preserving and specialty food manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of GRACELAND FRUIT INC (3 recipients).

Matched organizations

OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL, INCAI match · 100%
OTSUKA AMERICA, INC.AI match · 96%

Lobbying · 2025: $3.7M; 24 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026: $7.7M; $7.7M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026: $143.5K; 2 PACs

Lobbying by year

2023$1.2M
25 reports
2024$1.4M
22 reports
2025$3.7M
24 reports
2026$1.5M
10 reports

Top issues

Health issues66 reports
Medicare and Medicaid32 reports
Pharmacy23 reports
Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code18 reports
Veterans16 reports
Defense8 reports
Budget and appropriations7 reports
Miscellaneous tariff bills5 reports

Who was contacted

U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES75 reports
U.S. SENATE62 reports
Centers For Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)10 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

Todd Strategy Group$700K
14 reports
Thorn Run Partners$620K
14 reports
W Strategies, LLC$620K
14 reports
DB3, LLC (fka THE DASCHLE GROUP)$340K
8 reports
GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS LLC$300K
10 reports
FEDERAL STREET STRATEGIES, LLC$200K
4 reports
BLUEBIRD STRATEGIES$40K
3 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

Republican$96.5K67%
Democratic$47K33%

PACs sponsored

OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (OTSUKA US PAC)$203.5K raised this cycle
PHARMAVITE LLC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (PHARMAVITE PAC)$50.9K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Congress: members and bills

Through the organizations matched to this company: members of Congress whose campaigns received contributions from their PACs, and the bills their lobbying reports named. Shown beside the company's contracts as a comparison, not a cause.

Members whose campaigns received from its PACs, 2026 cycle

Brett Guthrie$7,500
R-KY-2 · House · 2 PACs
Jason Smith$5,000
R-MO-8 · House · 1 PAC
Bill Cassidy$4,500
R-LA · Senate · 2 PACs
Mariannette Miller-Meeks$4,500
R-IA-1 · House · 1 PAC
Gregory F. Murphy$4,000
R-NC-3 · House · 1 PAC
Richard E. Neal$4,000
D-MA-1 · House · 1 PAC
Lori Trahan$4,000
D-MA-3 · House · 1 PAC
Gus M. Bilirakis$3,500
R-FL-12 · House · 1 PAC
Nanette Diaz Barragán$3,500
D-CA-44 · House · 2 PACs
Troy Balderson$3,500
R-OH-12 · House · 2 PACs

$143.5K of the $143.5K its PACs gave to federal candidates went to 76 members of Congress.

Members whose campaigns received from its PACs, 2024 cycle

Bonnie Watson Coleman$10K
D-NJ-12 · House · 1 PAC
Brett Guthrie$9,500
R-KY-2 · House · 2 PACs
Jamie Raskin$9,000
D-MD-8 · House · 1 PAC
Mariannette Miller-Meeks$8,500
R-IA-1 · House · 1 PAC
Richard Hudson$6,500
R-NC-9 · House · 1 PAC

Direct and in-kind contributions the members' campaigns received (FEC), net of refunds. Party and seat are the member's current or latest.

Bills named in its lobbying reports

H.R. 1 · An act to provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14.4 reports
119th Congress · Became law · 2025
H.R. 1492 · To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to equalize the negotiation period between small-molecule and biologic candidates under the Drug Price Negotiation Program.4 reports
119th Congress · Introduced · 2025
S. 832 · EPIC Act of 20254 reports
119th Congress · Introduced · 2025
H.R. 1458 · Access to Prescription Digital Therapeutics Act of 20232 reports
118th Congress · Introduced · 2023
H.R. 2630 · Safe Step Act2 reports

Amounts, members and bills are as recorded, shown side by side. They say nothing about why a contribution was made, how a member voted or what a report sought. A bill number written in a report is read as the measure of the Congress its context points to (a law's number, the Congress written next to it, the title), else of the Congress then sitting.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.