Federal contractor · SMITHVILLE, TN

GRAHAM SERVICES LLC

GRAHAM SERVICES LLC received $3.4M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 30 awards (−7% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $27.5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($3.4M).

Obligations · FY2026
$3.4M
New awards
30
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
F74FTPJKJEK2
Small businessWoman-ownedHUBZone firm
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 3MFY2017
  2. 3.1MFY2018
  3. 3.6MFY2019
  4. 1.9MFY2020
  5. 1.8MFY2021
  6. 1.6MFY2022
  7. 2.5MFY2023
  8. 3.1MFY2024
  9. 3.6MFY2025
  10. 3.4MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$3.4M100%
    30 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$3.4M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Clay County, TN$964.9K29%
  2. DeKalb County, TN$959.9K29%
  3. Cheatham County, TN$677.7K20%
  4. Smith County, TN$596.4K18%
  5. Davidson County, TN$159.8K4.8%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. CHEATHAM LAKE OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES CONTRACT - ROUTINE SERVICES APRIL - SEPTEMBER 2026.$579.3K
    Department of the Army· Cheatham County, TN· Facilities & utilities· Mar 26, 2026 – Mar 26, 2026· W912P526FA053
  2. CHEATHAM LAKE OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES CONTRACT - APRIL TASK ORDER$566.7K
    Department of the Army· Cheatham County, TN· Facilities & utilities· Apr 2, 2025 – Oct 8, 2025· W912P525FA033
  3. DAL OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES- ROUTINE TO (JUN-AUG 26)$488.1K
    Department of the Army· Clay County, TN· Facilities & utilities· May 21, 2026 – May 21, 2026· W912P526FA067
  4. CORDELL OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE ROUTINE SERVICES (APRIL-JUNE 2026)$473.5K
    Department of the Army· DeKalb County, TN· Facilities & utilities· Mar 18, 2026 – Mar 18, 2026· W912P526FA048
  5. MAY - JULY 2026 ROUTINE SERVICES.$416.9K
    Department of the Army· Smith County, TN· Facilities & utilities· Apr 30, 2026 – Apr 30, 2026· W912P526FA061
  6. FY25 JPP O AND M CONTRACT AUG TO SEP ROUTINE SERVICES$415.7K
    Department of the Army· Davidson County, TN· Facilities & utilities· Aug 5, 2025 – Oct 21, 2025· W912P525FA072
  7. DR ROUTINE TO REC MAR-APR-MAY-FY26 ROUTINE REC$388.1K
    Department of the Army· Clay County, TN· Facilities & utilities· Feb 24, 2026 – Feb 24, 2026· W912P526FA036
  8. DR REC ROUTINE TO FOR JUN-JUL-2025 OR2511-REC-FY25 ROUTINE REC [111261]$347.4K
    Department of the Army· Clay County, TN· Facilities & utilities· May 27, 2025 – Mar 2, 2026· W912P525FA045

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. GULFSTREAM GOODWILL INDUSTRIES INC$10.2M−3.6% in FY2026
    WEST PALM BEACH, FL · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Facilities support services
  2. GOVERNMENT & DEFENSE SUPPORT SERVICES LLC$9.4M−59% in FY2026
    TYRONE, GA · 93% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Facilities support services
  3. KIRA GOVERNMENT SERVICES LLC$10.9M−24% in FY2026
    LYNNWOOD, WA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Facilities support services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.