Federal contractor · UPPER MARLBORO, MD

GRAHAM TECHNOLOGIES LLC

GRAHAM TECHNOLOGIES LLC received $3.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (−51% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $88.5M. Its largest customer was Defense Health Agency ($1.6M).

Obligations · FY2026
$3.1M
New awards
6
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
14%
UEI
MSJ8NJQDMWB1
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) program

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 9MFY2017
  2. 17.9MFY2018
  3. 13.3MFY2019
  4. 10.3MFY2020
  5. 7.5MFY2021
  6. 5.1MFY2022
  7. 7.8MFY2023
  8. 8.3MFY2024
  9. 6.2MFY2025
  10. 3.1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. Peace Corps$484.5K16%
    1 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 1 awards
  6. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$2.5M83%
  2. IT & telecom$529.3K17%
  3. Research & development$5000.0%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition14%
    US 39% · $434.5K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions14%
    US 8.8% · $434.5K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Defense Health Agency· Bexar County, TX· Professional services· Sep 26, 2023 – Jun 11, 2026· HT940823F0099
  2. Peace Corps· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Jan 10, 2022 – Jan 29, 2026· 1145PC22F0020
  3. Department of the Air Force· Hillsborough County, FL· Professional services· Jun 15, 2022 – Apr 23, 2026· FA481422F0099
  4. Department of the Army· Miami-Dade County, FL· IT & telecom· Mar 9, 2022 – Mar 13, 2026· W91QEX22F0009
  5. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration· Montgomery County, MD· IT & telecom· Sep 22, 2022 – Jul 22, 2026· 1305M422FNAAJ0109
  6. Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 19, 2025 – Dec 19, 2025· HQ085926FF830

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $1.5M reported

  1. ALEXANDRIA, VA · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 9 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. KNIGHT FEDERAL SOLUTIONS INC$23.3M+29% in FY2026
    ORLANDO, FL · 51% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Health Agency · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. LOCH HARBOUR GROUP, INC.$10.1M+78% in FY2026
    FAIRFAX, VA · 31% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. ISLAND CREEK ASSOCIATES, LLC$10.4M−100% in FY2026
    SAINT LEONARD, MD · 31% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.