Federal contractor · MOSES LAKE, WA

GRAYMAR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, LLC

GRAYMAR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, LLC received $402K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (+1,017% vs FY2025). Since FY2024: $456.4K. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($330K).

Obligations · FY2026
$402K
New awards
6
Sole-source
14%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
YQQLRN7JJU46
Parent company
GRAYMAR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LLC
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 18.4KFY2024
  2. 36KFY2025
  3. 402KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 3 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$391.7K97%
  2. Equipment maintenance$10.3K2.6%

Where the work was performed

  1. King County, WA$23.2K5.8%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition14%
    US 39% · $57.2K
  • Sole-source awards14%
    US 30% · $57.2K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications5.8%
    US 5.1% · $23.2K

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Homeland Security · 1 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 2 awards
  3. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Jan 14, 2026 – Jan 21, 2026· N0024426PS026
  2. Department of the Air Force· Spokane County, WA· Facilities & utilities· Jan 22, 2026 – Jan 22, 2026· FA462026F0031
  3. U.S. Coast Guard· King County, WA· Facilities & utilities· Aug 11, 2026 – Sep 24, 2026· 70Z08426FSEAT0015
  4. Department of the Army· Washoe County, NV· Facilities & utilities· Mar 18, 2026 – Mar 18, 2026· W50S8C26PA002
  5. Department of the Navy· Camden County, GA· Facilities & utilities· Jan 6, 2026 – Jan 6, 2026· N4446626P0008
  6. Department of the Navy· Camden County, GA· Equipment maintenance· May 5, 2026 – May 5, 2026· N4446626P0052

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $500K (2 subawards)

1 prime

  1. LYNCHBURG, VA · 2 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $1.1M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $54.6K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $2.2M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $500K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $3.8M reported

  1. CINCINNATI, OH · 4 subawards · Remediation and other waste management services
  2. LYNCHBURG, VA · 2 subawards · Waste treatment and disposal

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. TOA KANKYO CORPORATION.LTD$354.5K−2.1% in FY2026
    EBINA, JPN · 68% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Waste collection
  2. SCHITO WASTE & RECYCLING, INC.$518.9K−1.2% in FY2026
    FREEHOLD, NJ · 68% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Waste collection
  3. PJH CLEANING INC$202.5K−100% in FY2026
    DECATUR, AL · 44% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Waste collection

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.