Federal contractor · COLORADO SPRINGS, CO
GRYPHON ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC
GRYPHON ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC received $14.4M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (+4.6% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $90.6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($12M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $14.4M
- New awards
- 5
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- LLZKJ9N8GB18
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 3MFY2017
- 1.7MFY2018
- 3.8MFY2019
- 5.8MFY2020
- 9.5MFY2021
- 10.6MFY2022
- 14.4MFY2023
- 13.7MFY2024
- 13.8MFY2025
- 14.4MFY2026
- -30KFY2027
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Army$12M83%3 awards
- Federal Acquisition Service$2.3M16%1 awards
- Department of the Air Force$157.5K1.1%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Facilities & utilities$12M83%
- Professional services$2.3M16%
- Transportation & logistics$157.5K1.1%
Where the work was performed
- Monroe County, WI$11.2M78%
- Bexar County, TX$2.7M19%
- Pierce County, WA$351.6K2.4%
- Oklahoma County, OK$157.5K1.1%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition0.0%US 39% · $0
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.8% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Federal Acquisition Service· Monroe County, WI· Professional services· Jul 8, 2021 – Sep 2, 2026· 47QFSA21F0090
- Department of the Army· Monroe County, WI· Facilities & utilities· Apr 14, 2026 – Apr 14, 2026· W911SA26FA106
- Department of the Army· Bexar County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Jun 6, 2024 – Apr 3, 2026· W9126G24F0226
- Department of the Air Force· Oklahoma County, OK· Transportation & logistics· Dec 21, 2020 – Apr 29, 2026· FA810121F0004
- Department of the Army· Pierce County, WA· Facilities & utilities· Sep 18, 2025 – Oct 23, 2025· W911S825CA019
- Department of Veterans Affairs· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Sep 15, 2020 – Oct 2, 2026· 36C10F20F0051
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
By fiscal year
- FY2021: $0 paid out · $104.6K received
- FY2022: $0 paid out · $83.8K received
- FY2023: $0 paid out · $83.6K received
- FY2024: $0 paid out · $151.8K received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
2 companies · $423.9K reported
- ENGLEWOOD, CO · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- TETRA TECH, INC.$151.8KPASADENA, CA · 1 subaward · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- HURRICANE CONSULTING, INC.$27.9M−98% in FY2026TAMPA, FL · 48% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
- GOLDEN WOLF, LLC$47.3M−21% in FY2026LITHIA, FL · 60% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
- DELTA VECTOR USA LLC$19.8M+450% in FY2026HOUSTON, TX · 40% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.