Federal contractor · WASHOUGAL, WA

GUROBI OPTIMIZATION, LLC

GUROBI OPTIMIZATION, LLC received $133.1K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (+91% vs FY2025). Since FY2023: $424.8K. Its largest customer was Department of Energy ($49.5K).

Obligations · FY2026
$133.1K
New awards
6
Sole-source
91%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
T9MDF2XV8VK3
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 154.7KFY2023
  2. 67.4KFY2024
  3. 69.7KFY2025
  4. 133.1KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 2 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$111.1K83%
  2. Professional services$22.1K17%

Where the work was performed

  1. Clark County, WA$133.1K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition91%
    US 39% · $121.7K
  • Sole-source awards91%
    US 30% · $121.7K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Energy · 1 awards
  2. Department of Transportation · 2 awards
  3. Federal Communications Commission · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of Energy· Clark County, WA· IT & telecom· Apr 30, 2026 – Jul 27, 2026· 89243326PFE000960
  2. Department of Energy· Allegheny County, PA· IT & telecom· Mar 10, 2025 – May 13, 2026· 89243325PFE000858
  3. Federal Communications Commission· Clark County, WA· IT & telecom· Jun 17, 2026 – Sep 10, 2026· 273FCC26P0044
  4. Federal Aviation Administration· Clark County, WA· Professional services· Sep 3, 2026 – Sep 3, 2026· 6973GH26P02806
  5. Federal Aviation Administration· Clark County, WA· IT & telecom· Nov 26, 2025 – Nov 26, 2025· 6973GH26P00313
  6. Defense Logistics Agency· Clark County, WA· IT & telecom· Dec 11, 2025 – Dec 11, 2025· SP470126P0004

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $44.1K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. ARLINGTON, VA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $68.7K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $116.3K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $44.1K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $229.1K reported

  1. GROTON, CT · 2 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. MCLEAN, VA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  3. ARLINGTON, VA · 1 subaward · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. POWERDATA CORPORATION$158.5K0% in FY2026
    REDMOND, WA · 51% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEnergy · Computer systems design and related services
  2. DEEP WEB TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$179.8K+2.9% in FY2026
    SANTA FE, NM · 46% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEnergy · Computer systems design and related services
  3. CONVERGE POINT, LLC$86.6K−100% in FY2026
    KATY, TX · 32% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEnergy · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.