Federal contractor · RICHLAND, WA

HANFORD LABORATORY MANAGEMENT AND INTEGRATION LLC

HANFORD LABORATORY MANAGEMENT AND INTEGRATION LLC received $120M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (+9.1% vs FY2025). Since FY2020: $551.8M. Its largest customer was Department of Energy ($120M).

Obligations · FY2026
$120M
New awards
1
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
ULMYTS8ANMF4
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.4MFY2020
  2. 37.9MFY2021
  3. 76.9MFY2022
  4. 85.5MFY2023
  5. 120MFY2024
  6. 110MFY2025
  7. 120MFY2026
  8. 0FY2027

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$120M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of Energy· Benton County, WA· Facilities & utilities· Sep 29, 2020 – Oct 5, 2026· 89303320CEM000075

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $15.8M (43 subawards)

29 sub-recipients

  1. DGR GRANT CONSTRUCTION, INC.$4.9M31%
    RICHLAND, WA · 1 subaward
  2. WEST RICHLAND, WA · 2 subawards
  3. KANSAS CITY, MO · 3 subawards
  4. PORTLAND, OR · 1 subaward
  5. CHICAGO, IL · 3 subawards
  6. CHARLESTON, SC · 1 subaward
  7. RICHLAND, WA · 1 subaward
  8. PITTSBURGH, PA · 2 subawards
  9. YAKIMA, WA · 2 subawards
  10. RICHLAND, WA · 2 subawards

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Its reported sub-contracts equal 13% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $1.5M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2023: $1.3M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $16.6M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $11.8M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2026: $15.8M paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

67 companies · $46.9M reported

  1. WEST RICHLAND, WA · 7 subawards · Remediation and other waste management services
  2. DGR GRANT CONSTRUCTION, INC.$5.4M
    RICHLAND, WA · 2 subawards · Remediation and other waste management services
  3. CHICAGO, IL · 14 subawards · Remediation and other waste management services

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. RSI ENTECH, LLC$322M−28% in FY2026
    OAK RIDGE, TN · 92% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEnergy · Remediation and other waste management services
  2. ENERGY TECHNOLOGY ALLIANCE LLC$272M−22% in FY2026
    BEND, OR · 78% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEnergy · Remediation and other waste management services
  3. NORTH WIND PORTAGE, INC.$298.8M−23% in FY2026
    IDAHO FALLS, ID · 64% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEnergy · Remediation and other waste management services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.