Federal contractor · TUCSON, AZ

HARRIS ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP INC

HARRIS ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP INC received $1.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 11 awards (−39% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $21.4M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($597.3K).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.2M
New awards
11
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
ESK3GRMK16Z6
Small businessWoman-ownedHUBZone firm
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

4 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $1.2M in FY2026 together.

  1. HARRIS ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP INCTUCSON, AZ · Family page
    $1.2M
  2. HARRIS ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, INCSAN RAMON, CA
    $0
  3. HARRIS ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, INC.PORTLAND, OR
    $0
  4. HARRIS ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, INC.TACOMA, WA
    $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.9MFY2017
  2. 1.7MFY2018
  3. 528.2KFY2019
  4. 2.2MFY2020
  5. 3.3MFY2021
  6. 2.1MFY2022
  7. 2.6MFY2023
  8. 2.8MFY2024
  9. 2MFY2025
  10. 1.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$597.3K50%
    2 awards
  2. Bureau of Land Management$406.4K34%
    4 awards
  3. Forest Service$187.5K16%
    3 awards
  4. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service$4,0950.3%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$784.7K66%
  2. Research & development$406.4K34%
  3. Professional services$4,0950.3%

Where the work was performed

  1. Monterey County, CA$594.8K50%
  2. Mohave County, AZ$406.4K34%
  3. Union County, NM$187.5K16%
  4. Maricopa County, AZ$4,0950.3%
  5. King County, WA$2,5000.2%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEYS PRIOR TO FUELS REDUCTION PROJECTS IN THE PAYSON AREA.$1.3M
    Forest Service· Gila County, AZ· Professional services· Feb 20, 2024 – Feb 9, 2026· 12970224C0006
  2. ARCH INVENTORY SURVEY AND REPORTING. CONTRACT THROUGH GSA FOR PRESCRIBED FIRE POD UNIT ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY AND SITE REVISIT TASK$704.7K
    Forest Service· Coconino County, AZ· Facilities & utilities· Apr 21, 2023 – Feb 27, 2026· 127EAU23F0017
  3. SUPPORT THE FORT ORD BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE (BRAC) OFFICE WITH BIOLOGICAL MONITORING AND REPORTING TO MEET REQUIREMENTS FOR GROUNDWATER CLEANUP AND ADDRESSING MUNITIONS AND EXPLOSIVES OF CONCERN (MEC).$594.8K
    Department of the Army· Monterey County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Apr 8, 2026 – Apr 8, 2026· W9123826FA022
  4. WEST WATER CANYON VEGETATION TREATMENT$264K
    Bureau of Land Management· Mohave County, AZ· Research & development· May 16, 2026 – May 16, 2026· 140L6426F0009
  5. LITTLE RIVER TM ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEYS, ROSEBURG DISTRICT OFFICE BLM$245.9K
    Bureau of Land Management· Douglas County, OR· Professional services· Jul 23, 2025 – May 8, 2026· 140L4325F0091
  6. 0303 Q4 CON POW REC MILLS CANYON HERITAGE SURVEY LMIR NEW OUT$187.5K
    Forest Service· Union County, NM· Facilities & utilities· Feb 23, 2026 – Sep 29, 2026· 12363N26F0005
  7. CULTURAL INVENTORY-CNTRL SHIVWITS TRTMNT$172.2K
    Bureau of Land Management· Mohave County, AZ· Professional services· Jun 10, 2025 – Sep 24, 2026· 140L6425F0020
  8. MIDDLE MUSIC VEGETATION TREATMENT$142.4K
    Bureau of Land Management· Mohave County, AZ· Research & development· May 16, 2026 – May 16, 2026· 140L6426F0011

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $49.8K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $58.3K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $228K reported

  1. WSM PACIFIC SIOP, A JOINT VENTURE$159.3K
    HONOLULU, HI · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. WSP USA SOLUTIONS INC$59.9K
    WASHINGTON, DC · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. NAKUPUNA SOLUTIONS, LLC$8,795
    ARLINGTON, VA · 1 subaward · Remediation and other waste management services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 8 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. TEPA - WESTON JV$2.7M−100% in FY2026
    KANSAS CITY, MO · 45% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. LG2 ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.$2.8M−87% in FY2026
    JACKSONVILLE, FL · 45% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesForest Service · Scientific research and development services
  3. DIGITAL SALIENT SOLUTIONS LLC$2.8M−9.4% in FY2026
    ALEXANDRIA, VA · 45% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.