Federal contractor · PORTLAND, OR

HDR ENGINEERING, INC.

HDR ENGINEERING, INC. received $700.3K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 15 awards (−66% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $16.6M. Its largest customer was Federal Highway Administration ($700.3K).

Obligations · FY2026
$700.3K
New awards
15
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
USHVJJK5QXH4
Parent company
HDR, INC
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the HDR ENVIRONMENTAL, OPERATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION, INC. company family: 68 registered entities, $117.3M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. $29.1M
  2. $16.1M
  3. $11.4M
  4. $9.2M
  5. $8.8M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 394.9KFY2017
  2. 759KFY2018
  3. 5.7MFY2019
  4. -202.1KFY2020
  5. 1.7MFY2021
  6. 1.6MFY2022
  7. 1.8MFY2023
  8. 2.2MFY2024
  9. 2MFY2025
  10. 700.3KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 15 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$700.3K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $700.3K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.8% · $700.3K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Federal Highway Administration· Lane County, OR· Construction & real property· Jun 2, 2023 – Mar 25, 2026· 69056723F00055N
  2. Federal Highway Administration· Clatsop County, OR· Construction & real property· Apr 16, 2026 – Apr 16, 2026· 69056726F00054N
  3. Federal Highway Administration· Multnomah County, OR· Construction & real property· Mar 25, 2026 – Sep 23, 2026· 69056726F00040N
  4. Federal Highway Administration· Clallam County, WA· Construction & real property· Apr 22, 2026 – Apr 22, 2026· 69056726F00041N
  5. Federal Highway Administration· Fergus County, MT· Construction & real property· Apr 17, 2025 – Aug 31, 2026· 69056725F00017N
  6. Federal Highway Administration· Valley County, ID· Construction & real property· May 28, 2026 – May 28, 2026· 69056726F00063N
  7. Federal Highway Administration· Multnomah County, OR· Construction & real property· Apr 6, 2026 – Apr 6, 2026· 69056726F00039N
  8. Federal Highway Administration· Cascade County, MT· Construction & real property· Jul 1, 2025 – Apr 22, 2026· 69056725F00066N

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $155.6K (1 subaward)

1 sub-recipient

  1. BROKEN ARROW, OK · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Its reported sub-contracts equal 22% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2023: $631.5K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $265.5K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2026: $155.6K paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

526 companies · $363.8M reported

  1. STUART, FL · 9 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. WESTMINSTER, CO · 17 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. MILILANI, HI · 42 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

30 companies · $24.6M reported

  1. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION$5M
    DENVER, CO · 18 subawards
  2. LOS ANGELES, CA · 3 subawards · Facilities support services
  3. HUNT VALLEY, MD · 7 subawards · Remediation and other waste management services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 26 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. KANSAS CITY, MO · 3 entities · 58% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesState · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. TRAX INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION$561M−19% in FY2026
    LAS VEGAS, NV · 3 entities · 47% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC.$260.5M−45% in FY2026
    DENVER, CO · 56 entities · 34% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNational Park Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services+4 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of HDR ENVIRONMENTAL, OPERATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION, INC. (68 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • HDR, INC.AI match · 100%
  • Henningson, Durham & Richardson Architecture and Engineering, P.C.AI match · 100%
  • HDR Engineering, IncAI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$1.2M
40 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$4M
$4M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$350.8K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$1.1M
    42 reports
  2. 2024$1.1M
    37 reports
  3. 2025$1.2M
    40 reports
  4. 2026$630K
    20 reports

Top issues

  1. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code59 reports
  2. Transportation54 reports
  3. Defense41 reports
  4. Budget and appropriations29 reports
  5. Aviation, aircraft and airlines17 reports
  6. Aerospace8 reports
  7. Natural resources7 reports
  8. Real estate, land use and conservation6 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES123 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE118 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD$520K
    14 reports
  2. Constantinople & Vallone Consulting LLC$450K
    14 reports
  3. Corrigan & Ussery LLC$410K
    14 reports
  4. Tai Ginsberg & Associates, LLC$280K
    14 reports
  5. Burton Strategy Group$260K
    14 reports
  6. Tom Luce Consulting$140K
    14 reports
  7. TROUTMAN STRATEGIES$90K
    6 reports
  8. Water Strategies, LLC$50K
    5 reports

12 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$238.3K68%
  2. Democratic$112.5K32%

PACs sponsored

  • HDR, INC. EMPLOYEE OWNERS PAC$1.5M raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.