Federal contractor · HOUSTON, TX

HDR ENGINEERING INC.

HDR ENGINEERING INC. received $239.5K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−91% vs FY2025). Since FY2019: $4.7M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($239.5K).

Obligations · FY2026
$239.5K
New awards
1
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
MZQ5CHL59RQ1
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the HDR ENVIRONMENTAL, OPERATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION, INC. company family: 57 registered entities, $117.3M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. $29.1M
  2. $16.1M
  3. $11.4M
  4. $9.2M
  5. $8.8M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · jev-1.13.0 · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.5KFY2019
  2. 884.5KFY2020
  3. -49.4KFY2021
  4. 950.4KFY2024
  5. 2.7MFY2025
  6. 239.5KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$239.5K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $239.5K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.8% · $239.5K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Harris County, TX· Construction & real property· Nov 24, 2023 – Apr 24, 2026· W912HY24F0019

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $119.3K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $621.6K paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

525 companies · $362.9M reported

  1. STUART, FL · 9 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. WESTMINSTER, CO · 17 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. MILILANI, HI · 42 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

25 companies · $20.6M reported

  1. LOS ANGELES, CA · 3 subawards · Facilities support services
  2. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION$3.7M
    DENVER, CO · 11 subawards
  3. HUNT VALLEY, MD · 7 subawards · Remediation and other waste management services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 26 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. KANSAS CITY, MO · 3 entities · 58% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesState · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. TRAX INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION$561M−19% in FY2026
    LAS VEGAS, NV · 3 entities · 47% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC.$260.5M−45% in FY2026
    DENVER, CO · 38 entities · 34% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNational Park Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services+4 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of HDR ENVIRONMENTAL, OPERATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION, INC. (57 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • HDR Engineering, IncAI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$70K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$140K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$40K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$10K
    1 reports
  3. 2025$70K
    4 reports
  4. 2026$20K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code6 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations4 reports
  3. Natural resources4 reports
  4. Transportation4 reports
  5. Agriculture3 reports
  6. Clean air and water3 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES10 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE10 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. TROUTMAN STRATEGIES$90K
    6 reports
  2. Water Strategies, LLC$50K
    5 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: AI name judgments (entity-match@1, jev-1.13.0), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.