Federal contractor · CHICAGO, IL

HEALTH CARE SERVICE CORPORATION, A MUTUAL LEGAL RESERVE COMPANY

HEALTH CARE SERVICE CORPORATION, A MUTUAL LEGAL RESERVE COMPANY received $16M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−33% vs FY2025). Since FY2020: $109.2M. Its largest customer was Indian Health Service ($16M).

Obligations · FY2026
$16M
New awards
1
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
E86EH65TJVQ9
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $16M in FY2026 together.

  1. HEALTH CARE SERVICE CORPORATION, A MUTUAL LEGAL RESERVE COMPANYCHICAGO, IL · Family page
    $16M
  2. $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 3.5MFY2020
  2. 14.2MFY2021
  3. 18.3MFY2022
  4. 27.1MFY2023
  5. 6MFY2024
  6. 24MFY2025
  7. 16MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$16M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $16M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.7% · $16M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Indian Health Service· Cook County, IL· Professional services· Aug 5, 2022 – Jul 31, 2026· 75H70422C00003

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CHESAPEAKE, VA · 44% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveIndian Health Service · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  2. ANCHORAGE, AK · 10% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveIndian Health Service · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  3. COLLEGE STATION, TX · 5.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveIndian Health Service · Other professional, scientific, and technical services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of HEALTH CARE SERVICE CORPORATION, A MUTUAL LEGAL RESERVE COMPANY (2 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • HEALTH CARE SERVICE CORPORATIONAI match · 100%
  • Health Care Service Corporation, a Mutual Legal Reserve Company (HCSC)AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$4.3M
16 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$15.4M
$15.4M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$372.5K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$4.4M
    17 reports
  2. 2024$4.1M
    16 reports
  3. 2025$4.3M
    16 reports
  4. 2026$2.6M
    9 reports

Top issues

  1. Medicare and Medicaid42 reports
  2. Health issues28 reports
  3. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code21 reports
  4. Insurance16 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES56 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE56 reports
  3. Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC)2 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Capitol Tax Partners, LLP$980K
    14 reports
  2. Tarplin, Downs & Young, LLC$700K
    14 reports
  3. The D Major Group$310K
    14 reports
  4. Avenue Solutions$80K
    2 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$214K57%
  2. Democratic$158.5K43%

PACs sponsored

  • HEALTH CARE SERVICE CORPORATION EMPLOYEES' POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$969.8K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.