Federal contractor · FRANKLIN, MA

HEIDELBERG ENGINEERING, INC.

HEIDELBERG ENGINEERING, INC. received $70.3K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (−77% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $2.9M. Its largest customer was Department of Veterans Affairs ($70.3K).

Obligations · FY2026
$70.3K
New awards
5
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
K7TNJMC9MB73
Small businessWoman-ownedForeign-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 367.8KFY2017
  2. 606.7KFY2018
  3. 273.2KFY2019
  4. 182.1KFY2020
  5. 69.7KFY2021
  6. 76.4KFY2022
  7. 813.1KFY2023
  8. 82.6KFY2024
  9. 311.6KFY2025
  10. 70.3KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 5 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$70.3K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $70.3K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $70.3K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications100%
    US 5.1% · $83K

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs · 3 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs· Marion County, IN· Equipment maintenance· Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 31, 2025· 36C25026P0080
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs· Orange County, FL· Equipment maintenance· Aug 28, 2026 – Aug 28, 2026· 36C24826P1245
  3. Department of Veterans Affairs· Marion County, IN· Equipment maintenance· Jan 7, 2026 – Jul 8, 2026· 36C25026C0048
  4. Department of Veterans Affairs· Harris County, TX· Equipment maintenance· Sep 16, 2024 – Feb 13, 2026· 36C25624P1712
  5. Department of Veterans Affairs· Orange County, FL· Equipment maintenance· Sep 2, 2025 – Oct 9, 2025· 36C24825P2013

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $116.4K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. LANHAM, MD · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $78.9K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $116.4K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $195.3K reported

  1. HOUSTON, TX · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. THORNHILL RESEARCH INC$176.4K−100% in FY2026
    TORONTO, CAN · 38% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Medical equipment and supplies manufacturing
  2. JONESBORO, GA · 42% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Electronic and precision equipment repair and maintenanceVeterans Affairs · Medical equipment and supplies manufacturing
  3. ASTERES INC$154.3K+155% in FY2026
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 31% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Electronic and precision equipment repair and maintenance

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.