Federal contractor · ANCHORAGE, AK

HELIOTECH

HELIOTECH received $2.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 31 awards (+118% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $19.2M. Its largest customer was Environmental Protection Agency ($2.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$2.3M
New awards
31
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
13%
UEI
RP1JLTNSXXR9
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $2.3M in FY2026 together.

  1. HELIOTECHANCHORAGE, AK · Family page
    $2.3M
  2. HELIOTECHCHICAGO, IL
    $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 302.8KFY2017
  2. 779KFY2018
  3. 748.4KFY2019
  4. 1.2MFY2020
  5. 2.5MFY2021
  6. 1.1MFY2022
  7. 3.8MFY2023
  8. 5.3MFY2024
  9. 1.1MFY2025
  10. 2.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Environmental Protection Agency$2.3M100%
    31 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$2.3M98%
  2. Professional services$39.2K1.7%

Where the work was performed

  1. St. Francois County, MO$1M44%
  2. Woodbury County, IA$304.8K13%
  3. Cherokee County, KS$249K11%
  4. Johnson County, KS$221.1K9.5%
  5. Lake County, OR$175.6K7.5%
  6. Lake of the Woods County, MN$119.4K5.1%
  7. Anchorage Municipality, AK$111.7K4.8%
  8. Seminole County, FL$39.2K1.7%
  9. Kalamazoo County, MI$29.9K1.3%
  10. Cook County, IL$27.6K1.2%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition13%
    US 39% · $296.3K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions13%
    US 8.8% · $296.3K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. R7 ESO: CHEROKEE COUNTY SUPERFUND SITE REMEDIAL ACTION OVERSIGHT SERVICES OF OU3, OU4, OU5, OU6, OU7 AND OU8 CHEROKEE COUNTY, KANSAS$1.2M
    Environmental Protection Agency· Cherokee County, KS· Facilities & utilities· Jul 1, 2024 – Jan 14, 2026· 68HE0724F0077
  2. HELIOTECH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES AND OPERATIONS (ESO) - GENERAL MOTORS SIOUX CITY O&M$1.2M
    Environmental Protection Agency· Woodbury County, IA· Facilities & utilities· Aug 7, 2024 – Jun 11, 2026· 68HE0724F0132
  3. TASK ORDER$1.1M
    Environmental Protection Agency· Cook County, IL· Facilities & utilities· Jul 21, 2023 – Aug 11, 2026· 68HE0523F0082
  4. R10 ESO: WHITE KING LUCKY LASS SITE TO PROVIDE MAINTENANCE, INSPECTION, MONITORING, OPTIONAL NON-TIME CRITICAL REMOVAL ACTION (NTCRA), REMEDY REPAIR SERVICES AT A REMEDIATED FORMER URANIUM MINE.$1.1M
    Environmental Protection Agency· Lake County, OR· Facilities & utilities· Jun 30, 2023 – May 28, 2026· 68HE0723F0088
  5. R7 ESO: SOUTHEAST MISSOURI (SEMO) TECHNICAL OVERSIGHT, FIELD INVESTIGATION AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE$1M
    Environmental Protection Agency· St. Francois County, MO· Facilities & utilities· Apr 1, 2026 – Apr 1, 2026· 68HE0726F0019
  6. RAF ESO TASK ORDER FOR: ACM SMELTER&REFINERY, OVERSIGHT FOR OU1 AND OU2. SSID:0819.$989.7K
    Environmental Protection Agency· Denver County, CO· Facilities & utilities· Nov 10, 2020 – Dec 31, 2025· 68HE0821F0031
  7. R7 ESO: NEWTON COUNTY MINE TAILINGS (NCMT) SUPERFUND SITE REMEDIAL ACTION OVERSIGHT SERVICES$901.5K
    Environmental Protection Agency· Johnson County, KS· Facilities & utilities· Aug 8, 2024 – May 26, 2026· 68HE0724F0097
  8. SANFORD DRY CLEANERS SITE LOCATED IN SEMINOLE COUNTY, FL. LONG-TERM REMEDIAL ACTION (LTRA) ACTIVITIES.$834.7K
    Environmental Protection Agency· Seminole County, FL· Professional services· Dec 8, 2022 – Dec 10, 2025· 68HE0423F0014

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2024: $1.5M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $157.9K paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

7 companies · $1.6M reported

  1. ENVIRONMENTAL FIELD SERVICES, INC$1.2M
    INDIANAPOLIS, IN · 2 subawards · Remediation and other waste management services
  2. CASCADE REMEDIATION SERVICES LLC$100.8K
    MEDFORD, NJ · 1 subaward · Remediation and other waste management services
  3. EVONIK CORPORATION$82.5K
    PISCATAWAY, NJ · 1 subaward · Remediation and other waste management services

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. HGL-PORTAGE JV LLC$8.5M
    RESTON, VA · 99.9% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEnvironmental Protection Agency · Remediation and other waste management services
  2. PARAGON PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LLC$8.1M−90% in FY2026
    FOLSOM, CA · 92% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEnvironmental Protection Agency · Remediation and other waste management services
  3. KGSNE JV II LLC$11.8M−17% in FY2026
    MARLBOROUGH, MA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEnvironmental Protection Agency · Remediation and other waste management services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.