Federal contractor · AMERICAN FORK, UT

HENRY SCHEIN PRACTICE SOLUTIONS INC.

HENRY SCHEIN PRACTICE SOLUTIONS INC. received $48.1K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 8 awards (−44% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $521.9K. Its largest customer was Indian Health Service ($43.9K).

Obligations · FY2026
$48.1K
New awards
8
Sole-source
77%
Single offer
23%
UEI
YEGDA6XVFCN3
Parent company
HENRY SCHEIN, INC.
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the NORTH AMERICAN RESCUE, LLC company family: 2 registered entities, $3.8M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. NORTH AMERICAN RESCUE, LLCGREER, SC · Family page
    $3.7M

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 17.2KFY2017
  2. 66.5KFY2018
  3. 50.9KFY2019
  4. 42.7KFY2020
  5. 27.3KFY2021
  6. 35.6KFY2022
  7. 42.1KFY2023
  8. 105.8KFY2024
  9. 85.6KFY2025
  10. 48.1KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 7 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$34.3K67%
  2. Professional services$17.2K33%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $48.1K
  • Sole-source awards77%
    US 30% · $37K
  • Single-offer competitions23%
    US 8.7% · $11.1K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Health and Human Services · 4 awards

Largest awards

  1. Indian Health Service· La Paz County, AZ· IT & telecom· Apr 25, 2024 – Mar 13, 2026· 75H71224P00063
  2. Indian Health Service· Becker County, MN· Professional services· Mar 3, 2025 – Feb 25, 2026· 75H70525P00018
  3. Indian Health Service· Barnstable County, MA· Equipment maintenance· Dec 28, 2017 – Nov 24, 2025· HHSI285201800022P
  4. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Financial Resources· Montezuma County, CO· IT & telecom· Aug 6, 2023 – Oct 30, 2025· 75H70723P00205
  5. Indian Health Service· Custer County, OK· IT & telecom· Jun 29, 2026 – Jun 29, 2026· 75H71126P00095
  6. Indian Health Service· McKinley County, NM· IT & telecom· Apr 29, 2026 – Apr 29, 2026· 75H70726P00085
  7. Indian Health Service· Rosebud County, MT· Professional services· Nov 25, 2025 – Nov 25, 2025· 75H70926P00010
  8. Indian Health Service· Utah County, UT· IT & telecom· Aug 13, 2026 – Aug 13, 2026· 75H71026P00352

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

7 companies · $37.5M reported

  1. WAUKEGAN, IL · 581 subawards · Professional and commercial equipment and supplies merchant wholesalers
  2. VIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 153 subawards · Medical equipment and supplies manufacturing
  3. COLUMBUS, OH · 1 subaward · Facilities support services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 43 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. RANDOLPH ENGINEERING, INC.$9.7M−35% in FY2026
    RANDOLPH, MA · 71% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Professional and commercial equipment and supplies merchant wholesalersDefense Logistics Agency · Medical equipment and supplies manufacturing
  2. FULLERTON, CA · 69% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Professional and commercial equipment and supplies merchant wholesalers
  3. NOBEL BIOCARE USA, LLC$12.5M−44% in FY2026
    YORBA LINDA, CA · 2 entities · 77% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Professional and commercial equipment and supplies merchant wholesalers

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of NORTH AMERICAN RESCUE, LLC (2 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Henry ScheinAI match · 100%
  • North American Rescue, LLCAI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$40K
12 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$150K
$150K in its own reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$40K
    16 reports
  2. 2024$40K
    16 reports
  3. 2025$40K
    12 reports
  4. 2026$30K
    7 reports

Top issues

  1. Medicare and Medicaid28 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations20 reports
  3. Defense15 reports
  4. Health issues14 reports
  5. Trade (domestic and foreign)1 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES43 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE43 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Mehlman Consulting, Inc.$700K
    14 reports
  2. Liberty Partners Group, LLC$280K
    14 reports
  3. King & Spalding LLP$0
    8 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.