Federal contractor · GERMANTOWN, MD

HERRICK TECHNOLOGY LABORATORIES INC.

HERRICK TECHNOLOGY LABORATORIES INC. received $811.6K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (+1,043% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $23.8M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($562K).

Obligations · FY2026
$811.6K
New awards
3
Sole-source
75%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
VCBGE3YAWMT1
Small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the HERRICK TECHNOLOGY LABORATORIES INC company family: 2 registered entities, $1.1M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. HERRICK TECHNOLOGY LABORATORIES INCMANCHESTER, NH · Family page
    $275.3K

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 4.9MFY2017
  2. 2.1MFY2018
  3. 3.4MFY2019
  4. 2.6MFY2020
  5. 438.7KFY2021
  6. 3.8MFY2022
  7. 2.3MFY2023
  8. 3.4MFY2024
  9. 71KFY2025
  10. 811.6KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$761.1K94%
  2. Education & social services$50.5K6.2%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition75%
    US 39% · $612.5K
  • Sole-source awards75%
    US 30% · $612.5K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· District of Columbia, DC· Other equipment & supplies· Apr 7, 2026 – Apr 7, 2026· N0017326P2421
  2. Department of the Army· Montgomery County, MD· Other equipment & supplies· Apr 30, 2026 – May 28, 2026· W56KGY26F0049
  3. Department of the Army· Montgomery County, MD· Education & social services· Jun 8, 2026 – Jun 8, 2026· W56KGY26P0004

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $2.3M (3 subawards)

2 primes

  1. CENTREVILLE, VA · 2 subawards
  2. LEXINGTON, KY · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $17.5M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $10.6M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $7.5M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $11.7M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $6.2M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $2.3M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

15 companies · $55.8M reported

  1. GROTON, CT · 42 subawards · Communications equipment manufacturing
  2. MIDDLETOWN, RI · 3 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. CENTREVILLE, VA · 5 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. HAUPPAUGE, NY · 75% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Communications equipment manufacturing
  2. TRICOM RESEARCH, INC.$4.6M−81% in FY2026
    IRVINE, CA · 78% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Communications equipment manufacturing
  3. RADIO DESIGN GROUP, INC.$2.7M−100% in FY2026
    GRANTS PASS, OR · 59% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Communications equipment manufacturingNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.