Federal contractor · HOLDENVILLE, OK

HOLDENVILLE HOSPITAL AUTHORITY

HOLDENVILLE HOSPITAL AUTHORITY received $233.7K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (+77% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $3M. Its largest customer was Indian Health Service ($233.7K).

Obligations · FY2026
$233.7K
New awards
5
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
KKZ1AUKNBLB3
Parent company
SSM HEALTH CARE CORPORATION
Other than small businessGovernment entity

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the SSM HEALTH CARE GROUP company family: 2 registered entities, $836.5K in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. SSM HEALTH CARE GROUPSAINT LOUIS, MO · Family page
    $602.8K

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 315KFY2017
  2. 464.1KFY2018
  3. 196.1KFY2019
  4. 234KFY2020
  5. 356.5KFY2021
  6. 262.2KFY2022
  7. 334.7KFY2023
  8. 477.5KFY2024
  9. 132KFY2025
  10. 233.7KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 5 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Health & medical$233.7K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $242K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · -$53K
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.7% · $295K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Indian Health Service· Seminole County, OK· Health & medical· Nov 24, 2025 – Nov 24, 2025· 75H71126F27002
  2. Indian Health Service· Hughes County, OK· Health & medical· Jul 29, 2019 – Nov 19, 2025· 75H71119P00695
  3. Indian Health Service· Seminole County, OK· Health & medical· Dec 11, 2025 – Dec 11, 2025· 75H71126F27003
  4. Indian Health Service· Hughes County, OK· Health & medical· Apr 8, 2020 – Dec 16, 2025· 75H71120F27001
  5. Indian Health Service· Hughes County, OK· Health & medical· Apr 12, 2018 – May 28, 2026· 75H71118F27004

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $43.2K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. TULSA, OK · 1 subaward

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

5 companies · $3.6M reported

  1. PUBLIC SAFETY, MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF$2.9M
    JEFFERSON CITY, MO · 1 subaward
  2. SAINT LOUIS, MO · 4 subawards
  3. SAINT LOUIS, MO · 1 subaward

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CHARLESTON, SC · 74% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Colleges, universities, and professional schools
  2. SYRACUSE, NY · 74% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Colleges, universities, and professional schools
  3. CINCINNATI, OH · 74% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Colleges, universities, and professional schools

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of SSM HEALTH CARE GROUP (2 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • SSM Health CareAI match · 100%
  • SSM HealthAI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$0
8 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$0

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$0
    8 reports
  2. 2024$0
    8 reports
  3. 2025$0
    8 reports
  4. 2026$0
    5 reports

Top issues

  1. Medicare and Medicaid29 reports
  2. Health issues14 reports
  3. Budget and appropriations2 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES29 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE29 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP$440K
    14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.