Federal contractor · SAN JOSE, CA

HOPE SERVICES

HOPE SERVICES received $1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (+11% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $9.2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($1M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1M
New awards
2
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
G5EJMNB8BB28
Other than small businessNonprofit

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 881.9KFY2017
  2. 1.4MFY2018
  3. 970.2KFY2019
  4. 940.5KFY2020
  5. 658.9KFY2021
  6. 669.4KFY2022
  7. 712.6KFY2023
  8. 935.2KFY2024
  9. 926.9KFY2025
  10. 1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$1M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $1M
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $1M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Commerce · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Monterey County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Aug 28, 2024 – Jun 11, 2026· W91QF424P0025
  2. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration· Monterey County, CA· Facilities & utilities· May 5, 2026 – May 5, 2026· 1333MH26P0002

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

HOPE SERVICES received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0
Since FY2022
$160K

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 160KFY2022
  2. 0FY2023
  3. 0FY2025

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2022–FY2025.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $55K paid out · $72K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $66.5K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $31.6K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

1 company · $55K reported

  1. OCEANSIDE, CA · 1 subaward

Primes that pay it

1 company · $170.1K reported

  1. CITY OF SANTA CLARA$170.1K
    SANTA CLARA, CA · 5 subawards

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MAEK POONG CO., LTD$2.9M−36% in FY2026
    SEOUL, KOR · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Services to buildings and dwellings
  2. E & S CONSTRUCTION, LLC$2.9M−100% in FY2026
    WASILLA, AK · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Services to buildings and dwellings
  3. DAEHAN DEVELOPMENT CO.,LTD$2.7M+145% in FY2026
    SEOUL, KOR · 92% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Services to buildings and dwellings

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.