Federal contractor · BOULDER, CO

HOT SPOT LOGISTICS

HOT SPOT LOGISTICS received $125.6K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (+8.7% vs FY2025). Since FY2024: $262K. Its largest customer was Forest Service ($125.6K).

Obligations · FY2026
$125.6K
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
X3CVQGCSZ9J1
Small businessWoman-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 20.9KFY2024
  2. 115.5KFY2025
  3. 125.6KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Forest Service$125.6K100%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$125.6K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Montrose County, CO$92.1K73%
  2. Pueblo County, CO$33.5K27%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $125.6K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.8% · $125.6K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. HOT SPOT LOGISTICS COGMF000099 E96$57.2K
    Forest Service· Montrose County, CO· Facilities & utilities· Jun 30, 2026 – Jun 30, 2026· 1202SB26M1996
  2. HOT SPOT LOGISTICS COGMF000114 E247$34.9K
    Forest Service· Montrose County, CO· Facilities & utilities· Aug 8, 2026 – Aug 8, 2026· 1202SB26M3152
  3. HOT SPOT LOGISTICS COPSF001153 E194$33.5K
    Forest Service· Pueblo County, CO· Facilities & utilities· Jul 8, 2026 – Jul 8, 2026· 1202SB26M2715

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BRUNOE LOGGING, LLC$258.9K−100% in FY2026
    WARM SPRINGS, OR · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestryBureau of Land Management · Support activities for forestry
  2. WILLIAM RAY EATON$250.5K+2.7% in FY2026
    DAYTON, WA · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestryBureau of Land Management · Support activities for forestry
  3. GIESBRECHT JEREMY$230.4K−4.8% in FY2026
    BURNS, OR · 88% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestryBureau of Land Management · Support activities for forestry

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.