Federal contractor · BURLESON, TX

HOUSTON JUSTIN KREIG

HOUSTON JUSTIN KREIG received $129.5K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (−44% vs FY2025). Since FY2021: $1.1M. Its largest customer was Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education ($122.4K).

Obligations · FY2026
$129.5K
New awards
4
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
PVFUXN7BJCL3
Small businessMinority-ownedNative-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 34.4KFY2021
  2. 239.1KFY2022
  3. 247.1KFY2023
  4. 206.3KFY2024
  5. 230.1KFY2025
  6. 129.5KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$126.1K97%
  2. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$3,4002.6%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education· Mohave County, AZ· Other equipment & supplies· Jun 3, 2026 – Jun 3, 2026· 140A1126P0053
  2. Department of the Air Force· Other equipment & supplies· Aug 25, 2025 – Dec 7, 2025· FA524025P0085
  3. Defense Logistics Agency· Tarrant County, TX· Other equipment & supplies· Jan 14, 2026 – Jan 14, 2026· SPE8EE26P0227
  4. Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education· Apache County, AZ· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Apr 13, 2026 – Apr 13, 2026· 140A2326P0140

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 9 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. HOUSTON, TX · 51% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Agriculture, construction, and mining machinery manufacturingBureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education · Agriculture, construction, and mining machinery manufacturing
  2. SAN GIOVANNI LUPATOTO, ITA · 33% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Agriculture, construction, and mining machinery manufacturing
  3. GAINESVILLE, FL · 41% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Agriculture, construction, and mining machinery manufacturingVeterans Affairs · Agriculture, construction, and mining machinery manufacturingArmy · Agriculture, construction, and mining machinery manufacturing+1 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.