Federal contractor · PHOENIX, AZ

HOUSTON'S TOO LC

HOUSTON'S TOO LC received $17M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 17 awards (+28% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $88M. Its largest customer was Forest Service ($17M).

Obligations · FY2026
$17M
New awards
17
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
89%
UEI
PY6UPH2QRR43
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 3.4MFY2017
  2. 7.2MFY2018
  3. 2.4MFY2019
  4. 5.2MFY2020
  5. 19.7MFY2021
  6. 5.5MFY2022
  7. 6.4MFY2023
  8. 8MFY2024
  9. 13.3MFY2025
  10. 17MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 17 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$17M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Baker County, OR$583.7K3.4%
  2. Juab County, UT$256.7K1.5%
  3. Ada County, ID$221.4K1.3%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition89%
    US 39% · $15.2M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions89%
    US 8.8% · $15.2M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Forest Service· Chelan County, WA· Facilities & utilities· Jul 27, 2026 – Sep 26, 2026· 1202SC26M0775
  2. Forest Service· Fresno County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Aug 31, 2025 – Oct 1, 2025· 1202SC25M1494
  3. Forest Service· Umatilla County, OR· Facilities & utilities· Jul 10, 2026 – Aug 27, 2026· 1202SC26M0411
  4. Forest Service· La Plata County, CO· Facilities & utilities· Jul 8, 2026 – Jul 31, 2026· 1202SC26M0388
  5. Forest Service· Maricopa County, AZ· Facilities & utilities· Jun 22, 2026 – Jun 22, 2026· 1202SC26K2108
  6. Forest Service· Carbon County, UT· Facilities & utilities· Aug 10, 2026 – Sep 4, 2026· 1202SC26M1068
  7. Forest Service· Sevier County, UT· Facilities & utilities· Jun 28, 2026 – Jul 16, 2026· 1202SC26M0331
  8. Forest Service· Umatilla County, OR· Facilities & utilities· Aug 12, 2026 – Aug 12, 2026· 1202SC26M1017

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. THUNDER MTN CATERING INC$37.6M−2.1% in FY2026
    BOISE, ID · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Special food services
  2. BIG SKY MOBILE CATERING CORP$35.8M−22% in FY2026
    MISSOULA, MT · 93% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Special food services
  3. GFP MOBILE FOOD SERVICES LLC$22.7M+116% in FY2026
    SISTERS, OR · 59% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Special food services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.