Federal contractor · POMPANO BEACH, FL

HUNTER STRATEGY, LLC

HUNTER STRATEGY, LLC received $22M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (+27% vs FY2025). Since FY2019: $63.5M. Its largest customer was Defense Information Systems Agency ($14.9M).

Obligations · FY2026
$22M
New awards
7
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
DCNYSJXG7MW9
Small businessHUBZone firm

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 61.3KFY2019
  2. 0FY2020
  3. 4.2MFY2021
  4. 5.5MFY2022
  5. 6MFY2023
  6. 8.5MFY2024
  7. 17.3MFY2025
  8. 22MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 1 awards
  6. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$21.8M99%
  2. Professional services$143.8K0.7%
  3. Research & development$5000.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Washington Headquarters Services· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Dec 7, 2020 – Jun 12, 2026· HQ003421C0011
  2. Defense Information Systems Agency· Arlington County, VA· IT & telecom· Jul 29, 2024 – May 13, 2026· HC102824F0783
  3. Department of the Air Force· St. Clair County, IL· IT & telecom· Jan 31, 2024 – Oct 1, 2025· FA445224F0027
  4. Defense Information Systems Agency· Franklin County, PA· IT & telecom· Apr 6, 2026 – Jun 8, 2026· HC105026F0003
  5. Federal Acquisition Service· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Sep 28, 2026 – Sep 28, 2026· 47QACA26F0497
  6. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration· Montgomery County, MD· Professional services· Jan 11, 2024 – Aug 7, 2026· 1332KP24P0007
  7. Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 5, 2025 – Jun 4, 2026· HQ085926FE413

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $6.2M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $10.2M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $228.9K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $16.6M reported

  1. RESTON, VA · 2 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. ALEXANDRIA, VA · 8 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. MCLEAN, VA · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. LIGHTGRID LLC$23.7M−63% in FY2026
    VIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 50% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Information Systems Agency · Computer systems design and related services
  2. IPKEYS TECHNOLOGIES LLC$31.2M−100% in FY2026
    STAFFORD, VA · 2 entities · 53% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Information Systems Agency · Computer systems design and related services
  3. INDRASOFT INC.$35.2M−75% in FY2026
    RESTON, VA · 55% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Information Systems Agency · Computer systems design and related servicesFederal Acquisition Service · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.